Cinema Verite, or of Decay?

By Marin, Cheech | Insight on the News, September 21, 1992 | Go to article overview

Cinema Verite, or of Decay?


Marin, Cheech, Insight on the News


Summary: Film critic Michael Medved is no favorite of the Hollywood establishment, and that's not likely to change after the release of his new book. In it his vision of America clashes sharply with the one he says most movies depict.

According to Michael Medved, Hollywood's America is an evil land of murderous psychotics, serial killers, toxic families, heinous religions, lawless youth, rampant violence and sexual deviance. By contrast, Michael Medved's America is a land of happy marriages, solid families, prayer, patriotism and what he calls "traditional values."

The disparity between these two Americas made the film critic and professional provocateur angry, so he wrote a book: Hollywood vs. America: Popular Culture and the War on Traditional Values (HarperCollins), which will show up in bookstores this fall. His timing couldn't be better.

Dan Quayle's Murphy Brown speech in Los Angeles in May attacked Hollywood's lack of "family values" and set off a bicoastal war of words and sound bites.

Three months earlier, a cover story by Medved ran in USA Weekend. In an impassioned polemic extracted from his book, he argued that "America's long-running romance with Hollywood is over." His proof: a historic low in movie attendance, coupled with an impressive array of statistics on the box office performance of R-rated movies (so labeled for sex, obscenity and/or violence) versus those rated G or PG ("clean" by the Motion Picture Association of America's standards).

Guess which do better on average? G and PG. Guess what Hollywood makes more of? R, by far. And to what movie did the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences give the best picture Oscar for 1991? The Silence of the Lambs, about a cannibal and a transvestite serial killer and in which the cannibal helps the good guys. A USA Weekend poll accompanying the article asked readers to vote "Yes" if they agreed with Medved, "No" if they didn't. Almost 450,000 agreed, while 21,000 disagreed. A hot button was pushed.

The latest chapter in the story of Michael Medved versus Hollywood had begun.

"I expect every kind of nasty personal attack," says Medved, 43. "I'm expecting that the book will get panned, that it will be denounced as some kind of right-wing diatribe -- even though I go to great lengths in the book to say that I don't think of my position as right-wing at all and I try very hard not to be political."

That will be a tough sell. Medved is "hated" in Hollywood for his conservative views, says one insider. When his testimony on behalf of Paramount during the Art Buchwald Coming to America suit revealed he had worked as a script consultant for the studio, enemies called him a critic on a payroll. (In fact, Medved worked for Paramount before he became a critic.) He is an observant Jew in a secular town, precluding him from attending Friday night parties and making him seem, by his own admission, "lavishly weird." On Sneak Previews, the PBS movie review show he cohosts with Jeffrey Lyons, he is outspoken in his criticism of what he believes to be excessive sex, violence and profanity in today's motion pictures.

It is a frantic morning in the Medved home in Santa Monica, Calif. His wife, Diane, a psychologist and author (The Case Against Divorce), recently gave birth to their third child. The berith, the Jewish rite of circumcision, is in two days. Today is the last day for corrections before the book goes to print. Calls come in from Medved's rabbi, father and his brother Harry in Israel (who collaborates on Medved's Golden Turkey Awards bad-movie guides). Despite the distractions, he speaks in characteristically concise, fully rounded thought bites. The book, in a nutshell:

"Hollywood's fundamental problem has nothing to do with sloppy camera work or bad editing or unconvincing acting. The underlying problem has to do with the values of the motion pictures today, the fact that our major film companies seem to go out of their way to assault values cherished by most American families, and the result has been a collapse of the moviegoing audience. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Upgrade your membership to receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad‑free environment

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Cinema Verite, or of Decay?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved in your active project from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.