The Value and Valuable Work of Multi-Ethnic Literature

By Grobman, Laurie | MELUS, Fall-Winter 2004 | Go to article overview

The Value and Valuable Work of Multi-Ethnic Literature


Grobman, Laurie, MELUS


In 1990 The Heath Anthology of American Literature was published under the sponsorship of the Reconstructing American Literature project (RAL) of the Feminist Press. Inspired by the Civil Rights movements, the RAL project attempted to redress the limited, exclusionary conception of "American literature" represented in most university curricula, syllabi, and anthologies, and to affirm the literature classroom as a potential site of social and political change (Lauter, "Cultural" 180). The Heath, as it has come to be called, was designed to represent more accurately the diversity of American literature and the US cultural mosaic, past and present, than other existing American literature anthologies. The deliberate and intensely reflective intellectual and emotional processes guiding inclusion decisions are described in the preface to the first edition of the Heath and in subsequent published pieces by Paul Lauter, a key player in the Heath's publication, and indeed in multicultural literary studies generally (see "Cultural," "Implications," and "Reconstructing").

As Lauter suggests, the Heath has become more than a significant revisionist pedagogical tool or even a symbol of an instructor's commitment to multiculturalism; it has become a "cultural symbol" representing a sea change in what can be valued and a recognition that to value previously marginalized writers and texts is to challenge the authority structures that for too long relegated such texts, and such cultures, to the fringes ("Cultural" 183). (1) In this context, Richard Ruland's well-known review of the Heath, "Art and a Better America," is most significant for its critique of the anthology's political and social nature. While praising Lauter for his awareness of the difficulties inherent in "the marriage of two distinct theories of art that have rarely cohabitated comfortably," aesthetic value and social relevance, Ruland nonetheless insists that the anthology, and its editors' discussions of this issue throughout, fail to resolve in any effective way the tensions in this union (343). Ultimately, he argues, the Heath succeeds in offering a social, historical, and political vision but fails in its offering of a "literary discourse" (350). According to Ruland, the editors "speak more often of ideological hegemony, power groups, and economic motivations" (351) rather than of "what can be called 'literariness'" (354).

Lauter's published response stresses that in accounting for categories of race, gender, and class in the anthology, he and the other editors were "engag[ing] the most interesting social, political, and artistic questions, the questions of our time" ("Implications" 330), in effect asserting that these issues are interconnected. Lauter persuasively argues that the absolute severing of the political from the aesthetic is "theoretically naive" ("Cultural" 184), but in describing the inclusion of many new and unfamiliar texts in the Heath, he states, "Not all of these new texts are, to be sure, masterpieces--whatever that means" (189). Still unable to define what is actually meant by literary greatness, Lauter points to other justifications for inclusion, such as "historical importance, influence, and perverse originality" (189).

Lauter's inability to answer Ruland's demand for criteria and justification for the Heath selections drives my concerns in the discussion that follows. As I see it, earlier notions of the contingency of value are giving way to more critical evaluations of aesthetic value in multiethnic literature, such as the work performed by Robert Elliot Fox in this issue. (2) I hope to contribute to this effort by describing one key facet of what I see as a multiethnic aesthetic. This aesthetic, however amorphous and multiplistic, offers a worthy response to charges that literature by minorities is taught merely for representation or for politically correct content. Moreover, as it merges the political with the imaginative and the culturally-specific with the cross-cultural, the varied and variable criteria that constitute what I am calling the aesthetics of multicultural literature reaffirm literature and literary study as valuable work. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Value and Valuable Work of Multi-Ethnic Literature
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.