Reframing Accountability: A Preservice Program Wrestles with Mandated Reform

By Hamel, Fred L.; Merz, Carol | Journal of Teacher Education, March-April 2005 | Go to article overview

Reframing Accountability: A Preservice Program Wrestles with Mandated Reform


Hamel, Fred L., Merz, Carol, Journal of Teacher Education


The idea of evaluating preservice candidates by their students' academic achievement is jarring the world of teacher education. Such policy has become a requirement in state approval protocols, The National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) standards, and is even showing up in federal legislation as a proposal that professional programs be evaluated on the academic achievement of the students of their graduates.

In our state, Washington, teacher education programs are under a mandate to demonstrate that their candidates make a positive impact on student learning. The phrase "positive impact on student learning" occurs in no less than 19 different places in the Washington Administrative Code governing the approval of professional programs. It is a requirement for the mission of teacher preparation, a condition of program approval, an element of accountability, and a separate condition in each endorsement program. Several of these requirements specify that programs demonstrate impact using multiple methods of measurement over time. Another requires programs to retain candidate work samples to show positive impact. A new state pedagogy assessment will evaluate candidates by focusing primarily on what students are doing during lessons rather than on teacher behavior ("Performance-Based," 2004).

At the federal level, proposed requirements of states under Title II of the Higher Education Act make the remarkable step of asking that states rank teacher education programs by the test scores of the students of their candidates. At least one state, Louisiana, appears to be moving in this direction (Archer, 2004). And our own recent NCATE accreditation review explicitly emphasized the requirement that institutions demonstrate how "teacher candidates ... have a positive effect on learning for all students" (NCATE, 2002, p. 16).

In this article, we document our own unsettled responses to what we refer to as the "positive impact mandate." Although a host of research efforts today aim to illuminate how teacher education might be more evidence based, we offer an inside account of how one program responded to a specific state policy. We report on informal fact finding we did to determine how other teacher institutions in our state were responding to the positive impact mandate, we describe our efforts to meet the demands of NCATE evaluators, and we highlight dilemmas we continue to face in connecting the complex learning of beginning teachers to the learning of their students. As a documentary account, we emphasize our own grounded responses to issues teacher educators will continue to face as accountability reforms inexorably bear on teacher education.

FRAMING AND REFRAMING

The positive impact mandate differs in substance from long-standing practice in teacher education emphasizing the evaluation of instructional methodologies, management of the classroom, and professional behavior. Teacher evaluation, in other words, has typically been grounded in the behaviors, qualities, and growth that teachers exhibit rather than in changes exhibited by students--although supervisors and mentor teachers also have looked to student response, especially lesson engagement or time on task, as a measure for effective teaching.

On one hand, a positive impact emphasis seems reasonable enough. Not only are teachers hired to affect student learning, but the new policy language makes explicit what many reformers have long wanted--an emphasis on student understanding rather than on the act of teaching. The literature on teaching for understanding, for example, is replete with stories of sound pedagogical methods or curricula that yield conceptual misunderstandings among students (e.g., Schneps & Sadler, 1987). In addition, constructivist conceptions of learning, widely supported in preservice education literature, "involve fundamental shifts ... from focusing on dispensing content to placing students efforts to understand at the center of the educational enterprise" (Windschitl, 2002, p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reframing Accountability: A Preservice Program Wrestles with Mandated Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.