Administration Law - Ninth Circuit Holds That Attorney General's Directive Criminalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide Exceeded Authority under Federal Controlled Substances Act

Harvard Law Review, February 2005 | Go to article overview

Administration Law - Ninth Circuit Holds That Attorney General's Directive Criminalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide Exceeded Authority under Federal Controlled Substances Act


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW--NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DIRECTIVE CRIMINALIZING PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE EXCEEDED AUTHORITY UNDER FEDERAL CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.--Oregon v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2004).

George Bernard Shaw once wrote, "Dying is a troublesome business." (1) Indeed, in recent years the business of dying has become more legally troublesome, as legislators confront a modern medical landscape where the choice to extend life or hasten a painless death is increasingly feasible, spurring a national debate on the so-called "right to die." (2) The Supreme Court has occasionally entered this debate in cases addressing state prohibitions on physician-assisted suicide or state regulation of life-sustaining medical treatment. (4) Oregon has taken this controversial issue to the next level by legally authorizing physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. (5) Recently, in Oregon v. Ashcroft, (6) the Ninth Circuit held that Attorney General John Ashcroft acted outside his authority under the federal Controlled Substances Act (7) (CSA) when, in response to Oregon's law, he issued a directive criminalizing physician-assisted suicide. (8) The court reached the correct result, but in doing so it failed to state and justify an important premise underlying its conclusion. The majority's argument relied in part on the determination that the Ashcroft Directive raised federalism concerns and thus needed to be supported by a "clear statement" of Congress's intent to authorize such regulation. This argument, in turn, rested on the assumption that a federalism-inspired "clear statement rule" overrides judicial deference to agencies. Although the court failed to defend this assumption, there are in fact strong normative reasons for such a judicial preference.

Congress enacted the CSA as Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. (9) Under the CSA, physicians who prescribe controlled substances must register with the Attorney General, (10) who may deny or revoke the registration if its issuance "would be inconsistent with the public interest." (11) The implementing regulations to the CSA provide that a prescription for a controlled substance may only be issued "for a legitimate medical purpose" and in the "usual course" of professional practice; persons violating these requirements "shall be subject to the penalties provided for violations of the [CSA]." (12) In 1994, Oregon enacted the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. (13) This law allows a physician to prescribe to a mentally competent, terminally ill patient, after various precautionary procedures, (14) medication--including controlled substances covered by the CSA--that will enable the patient to "end[] his or her life in a humane and dignified manner." (15) In November 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft promulgated the "Ashcroft Directive," which announced that physician-assisted suicide does not serve a "legitimate medical purpose" and that practicing it "may 'render [a practitioner's] registration ... inconsistent with the public interest.'" (16)

The State of Oregon responded by filing a complaint in federal district court requesting permanent declaratory and injunctive relief and asking the court temporarily to enjoin the defendants (Ashcroft and other federal officials) from giving legal effect to Ashcroft's directive. (17) The district court granted a permanent injunction, (18) but the Ninth Circuit subsequently determined that it had original jurisdiction and heard the case as a transfer from the district court. (19) Writing for the majority, Judge Tallman (20) reasoned that since the Ashcroft Directive effectively criminalizes physician practices authorized by Oregon law, it "interferes with Oregon's authority to regulate medical care within its borders." (21) Regulation of medical care is "an area of law traditionally reserved for state authority," (22) and thus federal interference in this area raises federalism concerns. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Administration Law - Ninth Circuit Holds That Attorney General's Directive Criminalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide Exceeded Authority under Federal Controlled Substances Act
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.