Giant Aircraft Will Boost Military Muscle: A Multibillion Rand Order for the Airbus A400M Troop and Equipment Air Carriers Means SA Can Intervene in Trouble Spots in Sub-Saharan Africa Quickly and Effectively. but There Are Those Who Say the Money Could Have Been Better Used in Other Sectors. Tom Nevin Reports

By Nevin, Tom | African Business, February 2005 | Go to article overview

Giant Aircraft Will Boost Military Muscle: A Multibillion Rand Order for the Airbus A400M Troop and Equipment Air Carriers Means SA Can Intervene in Trouble Spots in Sub-Saharan Africa Quickly and Effectively. but There Are Those Who Say the Money Could Have Been Better Used in Other Sectors. Tom Nevin Reports


Nevin, Tom, African Business


The announcement came out of the blue, and it was the clearest signal yet that South Africa has accepted the role of Africa's policeman. In a short statement, the government said it had ordered up to 14 gargantuan, high-tech military carrier aircraft and had entered into a joint warplane building agreement at the same time.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

The order for the all-weather, all-terrain Airbus A400M transporters, at about R800m ($135m) apiece, means South Africa, as lynchpin of the African Union's soon-to-be-created peacekeeping apparatus, the African Standby Force, can land a significant force of men and heavy equipment virtually anywhere in sub-Saharan Africa at a moment's notice.

Each aircraft is capable of carrying troops, artillery, tanks, helicopters and field hospitals. Delivery will take place between 2010 and 2014.

The fact that the order was presented to South Africa by the defence ministry as a fait accompli, evoked howls of protest from opposition parties. The price for the 14 carriers is around R11.3bn ($1.9bn) about half this year's defence budget and a quarter of the 2004 government deficit. On accusations that the government had ordered the fleet "by stealth" in that there was no public consultation, that the fleet had not been tendered for and that parliament's defence committee had been ignored, the NGO, Economists Allied for Arms Reduction (ECAAR), rushed to the Cape High Court and obtained an order that prevented the government from signing the deal until all parties had had an opportunity to file the necessary court papers.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The government had earlier claimed that no tender was required because the acquisition was a "unique arrangement", and because "there were no other aircraft with the A400M specifications", according to Ian Phillips, a government spokesman in the transport department.

The legal action was of particular concern to the government as the deal hinged on a December 15 deadline by which time the paperwork was to have been in place and the deal signed. The agreement was only made public on December 9, and a judgement handed down on December 14.

As it transpired, however, the court rejected ECAAR's application on the grounds that it had not been proven that the government had acted irrationally, but Judge Deon van Zyl left the door ajar by ordering the government to pay its own costs and noting that the public was justifiably concerned at South Africa's spending on arms when housing, education and health services needed improvement.

COMPLICATED 'UNIQUE ARRANGEMENT'

The "unique arrangement" referred to by Phillips is a complicated deal put together by Airbus Military in Paris and the South African Department of Transport. In effect, South Africa agreed to buy military aircraft from Airbus to the value of at least R6.5bn ($1.9bn) in exchange for investment, technological knowledge and jobs. The deal, however, goes a lot deeper than commonly applied offset arrangements.

South Africa was also offered the right to participate in the entire A400M programme. In return Airbus wanted a commitment by South Africa to buy a minimum of eight of the aircraft by the end of 2004. As a player in the programme, South African industry would provide parts for the cargo planes.

If South Africa buys 14 aircraft, it would have the right to supply 7.2% of the value of the 194 A400Ms so far scheduled for production. And this is the deal-maker, says the South African government. This will allow the local aerospace industry to further integrate itself into world supply chains and win other contracts.

None of this carried much weight with the programme's detractors. The official opposition, the Democratic Alliance (DA), called for an urgent meeting of the national assembly's defence committee to discuss the matter.

What the DA's shadow defence minister, Rafeek Shah, wanted to know was whether or not the A400M contract was put out to tender, on what basis the defence department requirement was considered urgent in the face of an already stressed budget, if alternative aircraft (such as later C-130 models) had been considered, and why the deal was conducted in secrecy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Giant Aircraft Will Boost Military Muscle: A Multibillion Rand Order for the Airbus A400M Troop and Equipment Air Carriers Means SA Can Intervene in Trouble Spots in Sub-Saharan Africa Quickly and Effectively. but There Are Those Who Say the Money Could Have Been Better Used in Other Sectors. Tom Nevin Reports
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.