Guatemalan Bishop Joins Voices Opposing Trade Treaty
Jones, Arthur, National Catholic Reporter
With far less of the uproar that surrounded the passage of the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) treaty in 1994, the next stage, the Central American Free Trade Association (CAFTA) is being ratified without the Central American people's consent.
This was the contention during a March 10 teleconference with two Central Americans opposing CAFTA. They described the treaty as one in which "transnational corporations will have all the rights, and will destroy the Central American common market."
CAFTA will create a free trade zone that includes the United States, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic.
In a damning comparison with the European Union's approach to absorbing poorer nations into its common market, Costa Rican parliamentarian Otton Solis said, "Larger European countries opened up their labor markets for the poorer regions of Europe. CAFTA does not. And CAFTA doesn't have a cent in aid to assist with the economic consequences of the treaty. Compare that to Europe, where Ireland, since its incorporation into the EU, has annually received an average of 3.5 percent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in EU grants."
Bishop Alvaro Ramazzini, president of the Secretariat of Central American and Panama Bishops, replying to a question from NCR said the Guatemalan government has "excluded the protesting voices and, though it hurts me and angers me to say it, will actually ratify the treaty.
"We have two political parties in Guatemala that share the same neoliberal vision," said Ramazzini, bishop of San Marcos, "and they don't realize the extent of the poverty and marginalization in Guatemala."
To see how bad things will be for Central America, he said, one only has to look at the plight of Mexico today, where industrial wages have declined by 25 percent since NAFTA's ratification and undocumented migration from the country has doubled.
"This treaty introduces a race to the bottom. CAFTA was negotiated behind the people's backs," said Solis, founder of the country's Citizens Action Party. "It was negotiated at the margins; only the top hierarchy of the entrepreneurial sectors were consulted."
Further, said Solis, "it was negotiated under a threat that the United States will take away Caribbean Basis Initiative trade benefits if CAFTA is not ratified. Contrary to what is being said in the United States, it will weaken environmental legislation, and labor legislation.
"There is nothing in CAFTA about technology transfer, nothing on technology cooperation. We want CAFTA renegotiated," he said.
Dozens of U.S. church groups are among 48 national and international organizations that have lobbied for more than two years against CAFTA's present form. Those pressing for a change to what the Washington Office On Latin America calls "a CAFTA that fails the standards of justice" include Oxfam, the American Friends Service Committee, Church World Service, the Presbyterian Church USA and the National Catholic Rural Life Conference.
U.S. and Central American Catholic bishops, in a joint communique last July, said there had not been "sufficient information and debate about CAFTA and its impact. …