Hans Delbruck and Modern Military History

By Bucholz, Arden | The Historian, Spring 1993 | Go to article overview

Hans Delbruck and Modern Military History


Bucholz, Arden, The Historian


MILITARY HISTORY has often been written by what anthropologists call participant-observers--career soldiers or civilians who fought in wars. After Carl von Clausewitz and Henri Jomini one thinks of Helmuth von Moltke the elder, Theodore von Bernhardi, Max Jahns, Ulysses S. Grant, Ardant du Picq, Ferdinand Foch, Jean Colin, B.H. Liddell Hart, J.F.C. Fuller, Cyril Falls, Dwight Eisenhower, and Nguyen Giap. Wars have always been prominent features of human life, crises that humans get themselves into and then, if they survive, memorialize. Even for those who do not experience it themselves but send others to participate, war's climactic quality speaks to its uniqueness in human life.

Modern military history results from two additional factors undergirding human experience since the eighteenth century: the industrialization of warfare and the increasing division of labor that created modem professional historians. Its genesis and development, beginning slowly after the Napoleonic wars, encompasses the national wars of the mid nineteenth century--Italian, Prussian, and American--and the imperial wars around the turn of the century--Spanish-American, Boer, and Russo-Japanese. Modern military history reached full definition between and following the two world wars of this century. Like the wars, military history and historians were influenced by one other aspect of modernity, the burgeoning knowledge industry in both the university and the military Division of labor by knowledge and occupational professionalization dominated late nineteenth- and twentieth-century institutions.

Hans Delbruck (1848-1929) is an excellent example of a military historian who was shaped by the military events taking place around him and of which he was at times a part. His adult life was bordered by two of the most horrible dashes of industrialized war. He saw combat at Gravelotte and St. Privat in 1870. In 1914, at age 66, his country, Germany, pitched itself into World War I. By the end of the war, Delbruck had lost both a son and a way of life. In between these wars he was an academic historian at Berlin University during its greatest period of growth and he witnessed the radical industrialization of the German Empire.

Unlike his colleague Max Weber, whose participation in the invention and definition of sociology during these years despite crippling personal costs went along smoothly without institutional or bureaucratic opposition, Delbruck confronted strong resistance in doing the same for military history. A decade after 1871 he began a career at Berlin that, by 1914, resulted m half a dozen books and hundreds of essays and reviews defining military history as a separate and distinct discipline within German higher education. Neither the university nor the military approved of his efforts. Within the academy the dominant Prussian school of history argued that Delbruck's specialization lacked validity as a Geisteswissenschaft (humanistic discipline)--military affairs were best left to those who knew them, professional soldiers. Within the general staff, the Schlieffen school of historical strategy agreed. They believed Delbruck, a civilian outsider, lacked experiential legitimacy and could not truly understand armies and war. Both schools were rooted in German idealism and inspired by German nationalism. Although this battle lasted for a generation, defining and legitimizing a new academic speciality, Delbruck never really won. His tenure in 1897 was in world, not military, history. When he retired from the Berlin faculty in 1921 his request for the creation of a chair in military history was rejected.

In fact, only during World War I and thereafter did Delbruck's historical consciousness reach its final conclusions. He achieved this not in academic or technical military history, but in public history that was defined and argued over in one of the most dangerous political arenas for the life of the mind in twentieth-century Europe--the Weinar Republic. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Hans Delbruck and Modern Military History
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.