Detroit JOA Was Barely Approved: Deceased Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's Papers Reveal Justice Blackmun's Last-Minute Switch against It

By Fitzgerald, Mark | Editor & Publisher, June 26, 1993 | Go to article overview

Detroit JOA Was Barely Approved: Deceased Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's Papers Reveal Justice Blackmun's Last-Minute Switch against It


Fitzgerald, Mark, Editor & Publisher


DETROIT'S NEWSPAPER JOINT operating agreement only narrowly won Supreme Court approval in 1989 on a 4-4 tie because justice Harry Blackmun switched at the last minute from approval to opposition, according to the recently released papers of the late Justice Thurgood Marshall.

The papers reveal for the first time how individual justices voted on the operations merger of Knight-Ridder's Detroit Free Press and Gannett's Detroit News -- the largest JOA ever approved.

According to the documents, voting in favor of the JOA were Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor and Antonin Scalia.

Voting to overturn the JOA approval by then U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese were Justices John Paul Stevens, William Brennan, Marshall and Blackmun.

The papers show that Marshall's opposition was apparently influenced by the advice of his law clerks, while Blackmun was persuaded to switch from approval to opposition by the arguments of Justice Stevens.

The light the papers shines on the justices' thinking on the JOA case -- which was shrouded in secrecy at the time because of the 4-4 vote -- was first reported by Bryan Gruley, a reporter in the Detroit News Washington bureau.

For Gruley -- author of Paper Losses, a book about the long and tangled fight for the Detroit JOA that is to be published in the fall by Grove Press -- there were as many frustrations as revelations in the Marshall papers.

"There's just very little in [Marshall's] files on the JOA," Gruley said.

Nevertheless, Gruley's research did turn up some fascinating nuggets on the process that led to approval.

For one thing, the High Court's own legal staff did not think the justices would even take up the JOA case.

"This does not appear to be the type of issue which the court would review," wrote legal staff members Richard Schickele and Dennis McKinnie on March 15, 1989.

The case arrived at the Supreme Court after many twists and turns. On May 9, 1986, Gannett and Knight-Ridder filed for the JOA. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Detroit JOA Was Barely Approved: Deceased Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's Papers Reveal Justice Blackmun's Last-Minute Switch against It
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.