No Election Debates Please, We're British

By Davies, Philip John | Contemporary Review, May 2005 | Go to article overview

No Election Debates Please, We're British


Davies, Philip John, Contemporary Review


IN October 2004 The Guardian reported that 62.5 million Americans had tuned in for the first of the three debates to be televised as part of that year's presidential election campaign. Steve Anderson, creative director of Mentorn TV, argued that the level of political engagement suggested by attracting an audience four times more than the final episode of Friends, was itself prima facie evidence for the value of the televised political debate.

American presidential election debates have certainly had their moments. Many still remember Nixon's discomfort and Kennedy's calm demeanour from 1960. In 1976 Ford's mis-statements on Soviet domination in East Europe, and his inability to retrieve the situation when he was given the opportunity, did him no good. In 1980 Carter and Reagan confounded expectations when the President appeared low on substance, and the challenger failed to live up to his reputation as an extremist. More recently Gore's impatient sighs may have been more damaging than anyone expected, given that the 2000 election was so close. And while the 2004 debates did not give Kerry a victory, they certainly breathed new life into a comatose campaign, and the cut of Bush's suit provided grist for a public debate on whether the President was using technological aids during the event. The Guardian went on to ask about such debates 'Could it happen here?'

On the 5th of this month, the British people will vote in a general election. A general election in the United Kingdom is contested between political parties. The parties choose their leaders, and, unlike the American practice, these leaders do not take part in a separate public election. The Prime Minister is simply the leader of the political party that, when all the results are in, is in the position to form the next government administration.

The party political candidates are expected to base their campaigns on their party's election manifesto. While most voters never see a copy of the party manifesto, it sets the party agenda in a way that no other element of the campaign can claim. In UK elections candidate campaign spending is strictly limited. The precise limit varies according to the population size of the constituency, but is typically around [pounds sterling]9,000. Far more campaign spending is controlled by the national political parties. In 2001 the political parties spent nationally more than twice as much as the aggregate campaign spending made by all 3,319 candidates who stood for election. In a campaign so directed by the political parties, the role of the manifesto becomes even more significant.

The campaign in the electronic media is also driven by the party manifestos. The parameters of the electronic media campaign in a UK general election are firmly governed. The opportunity to advertise on TV and radio is strictly limited. All the major political parties that hold seats in the House of Commons receive a prescribed amount of free air time on the major national television and radio networks. This time is allocated to the political parties, not to candidates. No-one is allowed to purchase any television or radio time for political advertising. Neither political parties, nor candidates, interest groups, or individuals can add any radio or television political advertising to the allocation that is given to the political parties.

By convention the governing party and the main opposition party are allocated the same number of broadcasts and the maximum number of slots given to any party is five. In 2001 the slots varied in length from 2 minutes 40 seconds to 4 minutes 40 seconds. Other major parties are allocated time on the basis of previous support and number of candidates. Parties restricting their appeal to the nations that make up the UK are allocated time according to their previously demonstrated support and the number of candidates they are putting up in their region. Minor parties without seats are allocated time if they are running a reasonable number of candidates. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

No Election Debates Please, We're British
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.