Editorial


New Year is full of new beginnings and resolutions of greater or lesser seriousness kept with varying degrees of success. We constantly try to change the present in order to alter the future. Yet while we slip the calendar over, the past is changing too.

For there is no security or safe haven in that past. History is constantly re-inventing itself, shaken like a child's , kaleidoscope - the same materials shaped into profoundly different patterns. Attempts to fix history in objective aspic for the purpose of promoting a national or ideological myth are fruitless; its inevitable yoking to the agenda of a specific time and place often being apparent at the time and certainly since the myths have collapsed. Where are the snows of the Soviet Union's yesteryears - and what of Marxism's relevance to the interpretation of history? - something we have endeavoured to discuss in the last couple of years with our End of History series (now published in book form). Such changes remind readers that no history is set in stone.

Sometimes history's very materials change. |Put not your trust in princes' is a maxim which might well - for 90s Britain at least- be amended to read |put not your trust in heritage'. It would appear the fire at Windsor Castle has wreaked considerably less havoc than originally feared - but it acts as a salutary reminder that we cannot just shield everything in a protective bubble against time and fate.

For if Windsor Castle had been razed to the ground with all its treasures, would that have been a catastrophe greater than any of the heritage |disasters' of the past? How would one rank it against the destruction of the library at Alexandria, whose torching in the fifth century AD may have robbed us of up to 95 per cent of the literature of classical Greece? Yet culture and heritage survived - albeit with different materials, different patterns - in the kaleidoscope.

Even if material evidence from the past is not destroyed, or has been rediscovered (our knowledge of medieval wall-paintings, according to Pamela Tudor-Craig, has doubled in the past thirty years through their recovery from under layers of plaster and whitewash in our churches and cathedrals) - our attitudes to it are changing dramatically. This incidentally is why the recent attempts under English Heritage's new chairman, Jocelyn Stevens to establish a |winners and losers'league table of monuments in care - and then to try and shuffle off responsibility for those facing relegation - was so profoundly foolish and short-sighted.

Our interest in the social and cultural functions of historic remains is more in flux today than ever. Today's |loser' may be tomorrow's |jewel' - could Jocelyn Stevens have lived through the 1960s demolition of Euston Station's |classical' arch and not understood that? Fortunately there seems to have been a drawing of breath following the chorus of protest at the new chairman's |rationalisation' proposals and History Today readers may wish to strengthen the intake by writing to Jocelyn Stevens at English Heritage, Fortress House, 23 Savile Row, London W1X 2HE, to add their objections to the proposed cuts, and to any diminishing of the organisation's role.

Disparaging references, from Mr Stevens or anyone else, to the |bumps in the ground' outlook of modern archaeologists are sights similarly wide of the mark, for today, archaeology and the writing of history intersect as perhaps never before. In mid-November three lead coffins lay in the ruins of a seventeenth-century chapel in southern Maryland while all manner of hi-tech equipment and programmes, including one courtesy of NASA (the past meets the future indeed) were employed to discover more about their occupants (with what success you may read about later in this issue). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Editorial
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.