MARX THE MONSTER; More Than 150m Have Been Slaughtered in His Name. His Genocidal Disciples Include Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot - and Even Mugabe. So Why Has Karl Marx Just Been Voted the Greatest Philosopher Ever?

Daily Mail (London), July 14, 2005 | Go to article overview

MARX THE MONSTER; More Than 150m Have Been Slaughtered in His Name. His Genocidal Disciples Include Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot - and Even Mugabe. So Why Has Karl Marx Just Been Voted the Greatest Philosopher Ever?


HIS ideas justified the slaughter of more people than any other philosophy since time began.

His creed of 'equality and freedom' became a fanatical religion that ruled half the world and enslaved hundreds of millions.

Under his name, oppression, torture, starvation and genocide became the routine practices of brutal governments all over the world.

Yet yesterday, Karl Marx, founder of communism-progenitor of socialism and hater of the capitalist bourgeois classes, was announced the greatest philosopher of all time in a BBC Radio 4 poll.

How can it be that a man in whose name despots have justified grotesque levels of barbarism is hailed as a hero of the civilised world?

Perhaps it boils down to a matter of interpretation. The 'greatest' philosopher might be the one whose legacy has been greater than any other's - and Marx's influence has, indeed, been as colossal as it was utterly disastrous.

Marx himself wrote: 'Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it.' That he certainly did. As Francis Wheen points out in his superb biography, 'within 100 years of his death, half the world's population was ruled by governments that professed Marxism to be their guiding faith'.

Without Marx, there would have been no Cold War. Without Marx, no Iron Curtain, no Gulag.

So yes, his influence on world affairs has certainly been greater than that of any other philosopher. But ' greatness' surely implies approval. How can we approve of a man whose beliefs spawned so many monsters?

Without Marx, Lenin and Stalin would have lacked the ideology with which to inflict the terror across their land that resulted in 60 million deaths.

Mao would never have been the worst mass murderer in history, responsible for the slaughter of 75 million.

Britain and the West are rich and free precisely because we are not living in a Marxist state and have embraced the democratic capitalism that Marx so despised.

I find it breathtaking that people who are both humane and intelligent - as I'm sure Radio 4 listeners are - can lionise a man whose work gave rise to more misery in our world than any other individual.

Ah, say Marx's apologists. You are missing the point and being simplistic.

Marx, they say, cannot be held responsible for those who misinterpreted his creed, those who abused it to justify their own ends.

The monsters and dictators wilfully discarded great tracts of his philosophy, selecting the bits such as the victory of the proletariat that would resonate with their people.

Marx, they point out, would have been appalled by the crimes committed in his name.

This might be true, but does it absolve Marx from the horrors that have have been committed in his name? I don't think so.

To explain why, we have to study what Marx actually espoused. We have to examine where he came from and whether he could have foreseen the consequences of his philosophy.

While his followers massacred millions, Marx personally never hurt a fly and lived the poverty-stricken but bourgeois existence of an intellectual in Victorian Soho.

Born in 1818 in Trier, Germany, to a comparatively prosperous Jewish family that converted to Christianity, Marx became a radical journalist after university who advocated the 'merciless criticism of everything existing'.

In 1843, he went to Paris, but was banished from the capital as a dangerous revolutionary. In 1848, in Belgium, he wrote The Communist Manifesto with his wealthy patron, Friedrich Engels.

It was in 1852 that he moved to London where he wrote his masterpiece, Das Kapital, in 1867.

Married to a beautiful aristocrat Jenny von Westphalen, he could be vain, spiteful, unpleasant but, as Francis Wheen showed, Marx was also a loving husband who suffered grievously from the tragic deaths of three of his six children. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

MARX THE MONSTER; More Than 150m Have Been Slaughtered in His Name. His Genocidal Disciples Include Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot - and Even Mugabe. So Why Has Karl Marx Just Been Voted the Greatest Philosopher Ever?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.