Time to Deal; It's Round Four in the Six-Party Talks. Is Kim Jong Il Willing to Put His Nukes on the Bargaining Table?

By Lee, B. J.; Takayama, Hideko et al. | Newsweek International, July 25, 2005 | Go to article overview

Time to Deal; It's Round Four in the Six-Party Talks. Is Kim Jong Il Willing to Put His Nukes on the Bargaining Table?


Lee, B. J., Takayama, Hideko, Schneiderman, .. M., Newsweek International


Byline: B. J. Lee and Hideko Takayama (With R.M. Schneiderman in New York)

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill and North Korea's deputy foreign minister, Kim Gye Gwan, had a private dinner meeting in Beijing on July 9. Three hours later, North Korea's state television network interrupted its 10:45 p.m. weather forecast to make a special announcement. A broadcaster in a dark blue suit declared that Pyongyang was returning to the six-nation talks on its nuclear-weapons program, which the North has boycotted for the last 13 months. "The U.S. officially stated that it recognizes North Korea as a sovereign state, has no intention of invading and will have bilateral talks [with Pyongyang] within the six-party-talk framework," the announcer intoned, explaining why the country's fuzzy-haired dictator, Kim Jong Il, had decided to resume negotiations.

Pyongyang's decision to rejoin the talks, scheduled to commence in Beijing around July 27, followed what U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called an "intense" period of diplomacy. American, Chinese and South Korean government officials had all met with their North Korean counterparts in previous weeks--and all had dangled carrots in front of the isolationist, Stalinist country to draw it back to the bargaining table. China, North Korea's key ally, has offered to send President Hu Jintao on a state visit to Pyongyang. South Korea has done much more. It has promised to supply the impoverished North with 2,000 megawatts of electricity annually if Pyongyang agrees to dismantle its nuclear-weapons programs.

The Bush administration's main concession is rhetorical. It has maintained a hard-line policy on North Korea for years, and does not believe in rewarding bad behavior. But in the last few months Washington has notably softened its tone toward Pyongyang. Just before making an Asian tour in July, Rice seemed to make a point of identifying the North as "a sovereign state"--a remark Pyongyang interpreted as a retraction of her earlier description of the regime as "an outpost of tyranny." "The North often cares more about form than substance," says Ryoo Kihl Jae, a professor at the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul. "Washington's less hostile, if not sweet, words were a key reason for its return to the six-part talks."

The big question, of course, is whether the talks will accomplish anything. Many analysts are skeptical, noting that nukes are North Korea's only strategic asset and hence cherished by Kim as regime-survival tool. This will be the fourth round of six-party discussions with Pyongyang, the first three having achieved almost nothing. That's not quite the way the Bush administration sees it, however. "During the first round of talks, we agreed on a goal--denuclearizing the Korean peninsula," a State Department official told NEWSWEEK. "At the second round, the North agreed to some procedures on how the talks would proceed, and at the third round, we and the South Koreans, Japanese and others actually put proposals on the table." But as Rice made clear last week, "The real issue is, is North Korea ready to make a strategic choice to give up its nuclear-weapons program?" Cho Gab Je, a senior editor at the South Korean magazine Monthly Chosun and longtime North Korea watcher, is doubtful. "Kim will enjoy the game," he says, "but he will not make clear whether he accepts the South's [electricity] offer or not--and he will be vague about dismantling the programs."

But unlike in the previous sessions, the United States and its allies are expected to press the North more aggressively this time to make some concessions--and seem fairly unified on that point. In the past, North Korea has exploited a philosophical difference between Washington and Seoul on how best to deal with Pyongyang. South Korea tends to take a soft line with its neighbor, while the U.S. approach has been to demand that Pyongyang ditch its nukes before offering any significant concessions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Time to Deal; It's Round Four in the Six-Party Talks. Is Kim Jong Il Willing to Put His Nukes on the Bargaining Table?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.