Senate Armed Services Committee Testimony: Testimony Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 23, 2005

By Rumsfeld, Donald H. | U.S. Department of Defense Speeches, June 23, 2005 | Go to article overview

Senate Armed Services Committee Testimony: Testimony Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 23, 2005


Rumsfeld, Donald H., U.S. Department of Defense Speeches


AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY

TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SENATE HOUSE SERVICES COMMITTEE RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING, ROOM SR-325 JUNE 23, 2005--9:30 am

Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee.

I am joined today by:

* General Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff;

* General John Abizaid, Commander of U.S. Central Command; and

* General George Casey, Commander of the Multi-National Force in Iraq.

These general officers are doing an outstanding job and our nation is truly fortunate to have their able service. And I am grateful and proud to be serving with them.

One year after World War II ended--a leading news magazine published an article about post-war reconstruction efforts in Germany. It was entitled: "Americans are Losing the Victory in Europe."

The author despairingly wrote:

"Never has American prestige in Europe been lower. People never tire of telling you of the ignorance and rowdy-ism of American troops, of our misunderstanding of European conditions."

The year was 1946. But consider how different 1946 looks to us today. In retrospect, it was not a time to despair but to build as they did.

Now it has been one year since the turnover of sovereignty to the liberated Iraqi people. And just as Europe was a central battlefield--ideological and military--in the war against Communist aggression, so too the Middle East and Central Asia are the centers of gravity in today's struggle against violent extremism.

And I know the American people still have the same determination and resolve. They know today as then that these struggles are not won on defense, they are won on offense.

The task is to help more people understand the nature of this struggle we are in. Violent extremists have made clear their intentions: It is to kill as many Westerners and moderate Muslims as possible.

They have access to money, and to weapons--and they are seeking even more dangerous weapons. They are surveying and targeting landmarks in our country.

They have to be stopped. And together with the world we must find ways to encourage any would-be recruits to choose a better path.

Our nation's actions to liberate Afghanistan and Iraq have:

* Eliminated two state sponsors of terrorism;

* Most certainly contributed to Libya's decision to open its nuclear weapons programs to international inspection and renounce terrorism; and

* Encouraged democratic movements in regions that have long been breeding grounds for violent anti-Western extremism

It is not surprising that there are questions about the situation in Iraq today That has always been the case in a time of war It was true in Washington's time, and Lincoln's time, and Roosevelt's to be sure

Today the questions I hear are something like this:

* Is the effort underway in Iraq worth the cost and the sacrifice?

* How are the Coalition and the new Iraqi government really doing?

* When will Iraqi security forces be able to assume full responsibility for securing their country? and

* What happens next, and should Congress set a timetable to withdraw?

I will comment on each of these questions

First, whether the effort underway in Iraq is worth the costs.

It was not long ago, there was relatively little disagreement--either here at home, or in the United Nations--as to the danger the former Iraqi regime posed to the region and the world

The only question then was how long the United Nations should wait for Iraq to comply with the 17 Security Council Resolutions it had defied

By contrast it is important to note what success will mean

Specifically, a free, democratic and peaceful Iraq:

* Will not provide aid to violent extremists;

* It will not plot the assassination of American presidents;

* It will not invade of tire missiles at its neighbors; and

* It will not use chemical weapons on its neighbors or its own people

Let there be no doubt: If the Coalition were to leave before the Iraqi security forces are able to assume responsibility---which--we must not do--we would one day again have to confront another Iraqi regime--perhaps even more dangerous than the last--in a region plunged into darkness, rather than bathed in the light of freedom. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Senate Armed Services Committee Testimony: Testimony Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, Washington, D.C., Thursday, June 23, 2005
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.