Why the New Constitution May Split Europe: As Ten Nations Begin to Prepare for Referenda on the New European Constitution, the Future of the Newly Enlarged European Union Hangs in the Balance. after the Voting, Europe May Have to Reorganise

By Munchau, Wolfgang | European Business Forum, Winter 2005 | Go to article overview

Why the New Constitution May Split Europe: As Ten Nations Begin to Prepare for Referenda on the New European Constitution, the Future of the Newly Enlarged European Union Hangs in the Balance. after the Voting, Europe May Have to Reorganise


Munchau, Wolfgang, European Business Forum


If only they had not called it a constitution, there would not have been such a problem.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

In 2001, with the enlargement of the European Union to 25 member states only a few years away, Europe's political leaders decided at the EU summit in Laaken, Belgium, to initiate a process that eventually led to the establishment of the Constitutional Convention. The superficial reason was to amend the Treaty of Nice--which is regarded as seriously deficient because its voting procedures are guaranteed to produce gridlock in decision-making in an enlarged Europe.

A second reason was the wish to consolidate the EU's highly complex web of treaties and amendments into a well-written simple-to-understand document. But there was a lot more to it. The conventionels, as the members of the convention came to be known, also aimed to lay the groundwork for a much more ambitious draft, one that would officially recognise the EU--not merely as a collection of nations, but as a political entity sui generis--by giving the EU its own legal personality.

In reality, what the convention produced was another treaty, rather than a proper constitution. Foreign policy remains subject to the national veto, and there have been virtually no changes to the EU's framework for economic policy. The influence of the European Parliament has been strengthened in some areas, but the present balance of power, heavily tilted in favour of the Council of Ministers, remains unchanged.

If you are looking for a constitution for a future United States of Europe, this is not it. Or at least, it does not have some of the most important characteristics of a constitution. In particular it does not define the EU as a state. Legal scholars have argued that the various EU treaties have some characteristics of a constitution without being constitutions in themselves. In that sense, this is a European treaty in the old tradition. The main difference is that this one is consolidated, shorter and better written, with amended voting procedures and an extensive section on human and civil rights, known as the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

This constitution is being criticised by Euro-sceptics and Euro-enthusiasts alike. The sceptics view it as yet another step in the direction of a federal Europe, while the enthusiasts believe that this constitution contains so many compromises that it may soon need to be revised again. French socialists, including Laurent Fabius, the former French Socialist prime minister and finance minister, rejects the constitution on the grounds that it paves the way for a libertarian anti-socialist Europe. Many British business leaders reject it for the opposite reason: that the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and in particular its section on social rights, would render the EU uncompetitive in the long run. The constitution has polarised the debate on Europe further, but not in the sense that some love it and others hate it, but in the sense that people hate it for different reasons. Those who support it, do so without much enthusiasm.

The constitution needs to be ratified in all 25 member states before it can take effect. Of those 25 member states, 10 have agreed to hold referenda. Legally, the constitution cannot come into effect if any one member state, however small, decides not to ratify it.

But this clear legal argument does not fully capture the political dynamics of a 'no' vote. That would depend on how many countries vote no, but also on which countries vote no. That fact that ten governments have already announced that they will hold a referendum makes a 'no' vote more likely because referenda are notoriously volatile. In the past, the Danes have voted against the Maastricht Treaty, the Swedes voted against the membership of the euro, and the Irish voted against the adoption of the Treaty of Nice. In the case of the Maastricht and Nice treaties, the Danes and the Irish voted a second time round, and in both cases they voted yes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why the New Constitution May Split Europe: As Ten Nations Begin to Prepare for Referenda on the New European Constitution, the Future of the Newly Enlarged European Union Hangs in the Balance. after the Voting, Europe May Have to Reorganise
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.