Sociology, History, and Philosophy in the Research Quarterly

By Sage, George H.; Dyreson, Mark S. et al. | Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, June 2005 | Go to article overview

Sociology, History, and Philosophy in the Research Quarterly


Sage, George H., Dyreson, Mark S., Kretchmar, R. Scott, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport


The accounts of our subdiscipline's contributions to The Research Quarterly are similar. Sociology, history, and philosophy operate at some distance from the biological sciences. The research methods used by scholars in each of our domains address distinctive issues related to objectivity and, thus, validity. Our contributions to The Research Quarterly have been modest, numbering about 240 articles, or slightly over 3 per volume. In short, we have enjoyed only a minority presence in The Research Quarterly during its 75 years of existence. Our stories, however, also diverge in important ways. Our research methods are different, and our relationships with our parent disciplines are not the same. In addition, our perceptions of The Research Quarterly as a potential repository for our respective publications vary considerably.

Key words: humanities, physical activity, scholarship, social sciences

**********

The three following accounts of our subdisciplines and their contributions to The Research Quarterly (RQ: the name was changed to the Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport in 1980 but will be referred to as the RQ throughout the remainder of this article) are similar. All three areas operate at some distance from the biological sciences. The research methods used by scholars in each of our domains address distinctive issues related to objectivity and, thus, validity. Our publications invariably touch on such difficult-to-measure phenomena as what individuals think, how culture develops, and what groups of people believe now or valued in the past.

As a group, our three subdisciplines have contributed only marginally to The Research Quarterly. In round numbers, we produced about 240 articles for the journal, or slightly over 3 articles per volume. While some of this work has been of high quality, and while our subdisciplines have carved out a firm if small niche in RQ across the decades, it is also clear that our presence is dwarfed by such subdisciplines as physiology, biomechanics, and pedagogy. Consequently, it can be said that our collective story is much the same. We have enjoyed only a minority presence in The Research Quarterly during its 75 years of existence.

It is also the case, however, that our stories diverge in important ways. Our research methods are different. Our relationships with our parent disciplines are not the same. The development of our subdisciplines in the 1960s and 1970s and the founding of our specialized journals have taken diverse routes. And, significantly, our perceptions of The Research Quarterly as a potential repository for our respective publications vary considerably. Sociology and history are far more visible in RQ than is philosophy.

The following pages, consequently, provide an account of both convergence and divergence. In similar and different ways, under common and diverse conditions, sociology, history, and philosophy have helped Research Quarterly fulfill its mission as valuable interdisciplinary journal in kinesiology.

Sociocultural Aspects of Physical Activity Research as Represented in the The Research Quarterly

The main purpose of the section is to describe how the sociocultural aspects of physical activity research have been represented in the The Research Quarterly and how this has contributed to human movement scholarship. As a preface to that task, we begin with three general statements. First, the word "sociocultural" is used in this paper as a general concept concerned with the systematic study of social phenomena that overlap the disciplines of sociology, anthropology, and cultural studies. Second, there is no absolute standard for classifying human movement study and research as sociocultural. We have given priority to RQ research contributions that seemed to emphasize variables, issues, or questions that were sociological, anthropological, or cultural studies. There was a great deal of ambiguity even in doing that. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sociology, History, and Philosophy in the Research Quarterly
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.