Respecting Women's Rights and Fetal Value: Reflections on the Question of Fetal Anesthesia

Conscience, Autumn 2005 | Go to article overview

Respecting Women's Rights and Fetal Value: Reflections on the Question of Fetal Anesthesia


Earlier this year, Senator Sam Brownback, a Republican from Kansas, introduced the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (S.51).

The introduction of legislation by those opposed to legal abortion that would require doctors to not only inform women that fetuses post-20 weeks might feel pain and to offer women the option of anesthesia for the fetus, but also to do so in ways that were profoundly insensitive to women, made us aware of the medical discussion that was going on about this issue. However, before we could decide what position we might have on any specific piece of legislation, we needed to better understand the science and develop an ethical position on the matter.

Having done that to the extent possible (data on this matter is limited and more suggestive than definitive), we have come to the following conclusions:

1. The question of whether or not fetuses can feel pain in what is best described as a "gray zone" (20-26 weeks) is not "junk science," but a legitimate area of scientific inquiry with medical specialists, who have no axe to grind regarding abortion, working to figure this out. The impetus comes primarily from those engaged in fetal surgery as well as in the field of pain studies and fetal development. At present, there are those who believe it is possible that fetuses about 20 weeks' gestation might feel pain and those who believe it is not possible. Much of the speculation depends on how one defines pain, definitions that are themselves speculative.

We have concluded that it is possible but not probable that fetuses in the range of 20-26 weeks experience pain, and that even that possibility should lead us to act with caution and aim to diminish or eliminate possible fetal pain during abortion.

2. In spite of serious attempts to find out if fetal anesthesia represented any significant risk to women's health, we have been unable to get concrete responses to this question from experts. It has been indicated that the low number of cases in which fetal anesthesia has been administered makes it difficult to answer this question. Speculation runs in the direction of minimal risk, given the small amount of anesthesia used. Some fetal surgeons believe the anesthesia given the woman crosses the placental barrier; others disagree. Some fetal surgeons provide anesthesia for the fetus; others do not.

We support federally funded research into this matter for both fetal surgery and abortion.

3. In our experiences in the provision of abortion services, a significant number of women who had decided to have an abortion were interested in knowing about the fetus. They asked about fetal size, level of development and awareness and asked: "Will my fetus (or baby, the term we have heard women use most often) feel pain?"

4. We are guided by several values: first, the belief that women should be fully informed about all aspects of the abortion they are seeking and that informed consent means more than a description of the medical procedure and the risks and complications. It should include relevant biological, psychological and ethical information, which includes accurate information about the fetus. We believe women should be presented with the range of options for types of procedures and anesthesia, with the decision left to the woman. For example, while it is true that complication rates from abortion where women receive local anesthesia are lower than where general anesthesia is provided, we believe women should be given the information and the option.

We think informing women of the state of the medical discussion on fetal pain, the various opinions about this and allowing them to choose whether or not they want anesthesia for the fetus is consistent with our values regarding informed consent.

Our second commitment is to compassion and the alleviation of suffering and to abortion provision that is as physically and emotionally as painless as possible for all concerned. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Respecting Women's Rights and Fetal Value: Reflections on the Question of Fetal Anesthesia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.