Levi-Strauss and the Political: The Elementary Structures of Kinship and the Resolution of Relations between Indigenous People and Settler states/Levi-Strauss et le Politique: Les Structures Elementaires De la Parente Dans la Resolution Des Relations Entre Peuples Indigenes et Nations Colonisatrices

By Asch, Michael | Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, September 2005 | Go to article overview

Levi-Strauss and the Political: The Elementary Structures of Kinship and the Resolution of Relations between Indigenous People and Settler states/Levi-Strauss et le Politique: Les Structures Elementaires De la Parente Dans la Resolution Des Relations Entre Peuples Indigenes et Nations Colonisatrices


Asch, Michael, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute


Introduction

Levi-Strauss's writings on kinship, as we are well aware, probe fundamental theoretical and analytic issues of vital interest to the study of society. Notwithstanding his own intellectual path in recent years and the vagaries of anthropological interest in the study of kinship, (1) the ideas he developed in his kinship studies continue to be considered in some detail by the scholarly community (e.g. Bataille 1991 [1978]; Butler 2000; Carsten & Hugh-Jones 1995; Derrida 1974 [1967]; Foucault 1990 [1978]; Godelier 2004; Maybury-Lewis & Almagor 1989).

This article is intended to be one such reflection. It will give further consideration to Levi-Strauss's contribution to the study of the origins of society, primarily as it is explored in his monumental work on that topic, The elementary structures of kinship (1969 [1949]). I am undertaking this reflection because I have found that a return to this theme in his work is valuable in two respects. First, Levi-Strauss addresses an enduring theme in Western political thought in an innovative and productive way. Second, he addresses a specific political concern with which I have been engaged for over thirty years, that of justly resolving political relations between Canada and the indigenous peoples who find themselves living within its borders. (2) In this regard, Levi-Strauss's version of the origins of society contrasts with more familiar ones in challenging fundamentally the legal doctrine of terra nullius which settler states (3) rely on to legitimate their acquisition of sovereignty and jurisdiction over indigenous peoples. At the same time, his version facilitates an understanding of the concept of 'Treaty' as developed in an important line in indigenous thought which, if adopted by settler states, would resolve this political relationship with social justice.

In essence, my argument is that Levi-Strauss's treatise on the origins of society advances the proposition that, for society to exist, it is necessary for Self and Other to join in a common project in which it is essential for both to respect and maintain each other's distinctiveness and autonomy.

In addressing Levi-Strauss's work on kinship I am returning to a theme that has provoked much disagreement and controversy. Two criticisms are of particular importance and deserve mention at the outset. The first, levelled principally by Derrida (1974 [1967]), is that Levi-Strauss's treatise is merely a conventional version of the Enlightenment-inspired political thought in the tradition of Rousseau. The second is the objection raised by those scholars who are justifiably troubled with the obvious androcentrism of his argument and its concomitant dismissal of the agency of women and, therefore, their very humanity.

While I agree with Derrida that Levi-Strauss's argument exists within Western political thought, I will show that, contrary to his perspective, The elementary structures of kinship challenges conventional Enlightenment-inspired political discourse, including that in the tradition of Rousseau. I will also briefly raise the possibility that Levi-Strauss's argument has an affinity with the philosophical orientation of Martin Buber (1970 [1923]) and Emmanuel Levinas. I concur with the second criticism and will, as I justify below, therefore replace the word 'women' with the phrase 'marriage partners' in this article.

To set the context for this article, I will review the two principal ways in which the parameters of original society are established in Enlightenment-inspired political thought and show how these are reflected in Levi-Strauss's writings.

Establishing original society in political and anthropological theory

Depiction of the 'origins of society' and characterization of the original form of society represent central foci in Enlightenment-inspired political thought. In this tradition there have been two dominant ways in which the character of these foci has been established. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Levi-Strauss and the Political: The Elementary Structures of Kinship and the Resolution of Relations between Indigenous People and Settler states/Levi-Strauss et le Politique: Les Structures Elementaires De la Parente Dans la Resolution Des Relations Entre Peuples Indigenes et Nations Colonisatrices
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.