A 'Right' That Turns Doctors into Killers

The Mail on Sunday (London, England), October 16, 2005 | Go to article overview

A 'Right' That Turns Doctors into Killers


Byline: WILLIAM REES-MOGG

There was a great debate in the House of Lords last Monday which showed a breadth of knowledge and experience that could not be matched in the House of Commons.

The subject of the debate was the Report of the Select Committee on the Bill For Assisted Dying For The Terminally Ill. The report was published in April; there are two volumes of evidence.

Anyone who wants to understand the arguments for and against assisted suicide will need to study the report, the evidence and the debate.

These will, I think, become classic documents. Their high quality owes much to the chairman of the committee, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, the distinguished former Lord Chancellor.

There are two stages in this argument. People first have to decide whether the principle of medical euthanasia can ever be justified.

When our domestic pets are in pain, or terminally ill, or sometimes for lesser reasons, we have them killed, 'to put them out of their misery'.

Would it be a social good to do the same for humans, subject to their consent, or is there something about human life that is sacred? Is killing humans for medical reasons always wrong?

There are many aspects to this debate, which obviously raises issues such as pacifism, religious belief, the autonomy of the human, the quality of medical care for the dying and so on.

I think all one can do is state one's own conviction. Like most Roman Catholics, I think medical killing is always wrong, but that there is no obligation, on doctors or patients, to push extreme treatments beyond the point at which they can only prolong suffering.

What I did not fully realise was the complexity of the purely medical arguments that arise if euthanasia is allowed in principle, whether as direct killing or as assisted suicide.

These problems were brought out best in the evidence, particularly that of doctors and nurses.

Fortunately, most of us do not have to deal with many deaths in our lifetimes, and we have little idea whether a death we have been close to is relatively typical or quite unusual.

Doctors and nurses see a large number of deaths, sometimes 1,000 or more in their careers, and they are in a position to take a general view.

That is not to say that all medical people are in agreement about euthanasia. They are not. There is, however, a widespread reluctance among doctors to take the responsibility for causing death. All opinion polls suggest that more doctors are opposed to euthanasia than members of the public, perhaps because the doctors would have to carry it out.

If society does decide to allow euthanasia, it will undoubtedly be putting a new strain on doctors and nurses. Professor Richard Glynn Owens, who has spent the past 20 years working on the care of dying people, observed in his evidence, 'our own research into the provision of euthanasia by doctors in Holland (the only research of its kind, to date) has highlighted the extent to which doctors find the procedures distressing.

There is a very real risk that the provision of euthanasia will have a stressful impact on practitioners.' Only a minority of advocates of euthanasia, or of assisted suicide, would be willing to inject the syringe themselves. Is it fair to put that moral burden on to doctors?

There are other points that arise if we look at euthanasia from the doctors' or the nurses' point of view.

The National Group of Palliative Care Nurse Consultants put one pithy point: 'The Bill makes the assumption that end-of-life care is physician-led. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A 'Right' That Turns Doctors into Killers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.