New Expose on Anita Hill Worthy of Melodramatic Title

By Starr, Richard | Insight on the News, May 17, 1993 | Go to article overview

New Expose on Anita Hill Worthy of Melodramatic Title


Starr, Richard, Insight on the News


In his new book, The Real Anita Hill (Free Press), my onetime Insight colleague David Brock does what the U.S. Senate and the rest of the press conspicuously failed to do when confronted with Hill's accusations against Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas: He seeks the truth.

After the show trial, the Senate, to be sure, appointed a special counsel to conduct an investigation. But Peter Fleming's mandate was narrow -- to find out who had violated Senate rules by leaking Hill's confidential allegations, not to weigh the evidence for and against her charges.

As I recall, several senators during the Hill/Thomas hearings made the point that the Proceedings were not a trial. This was said as if it were some boon to the nominee. Based on the evidence gathered by Brock, however, the inescapable conclusion is that Thomas -- and the truth -- would have been far better served by a real trial. The facts and corroboration were all on his side.

Here is Brock's devastating summary of Hill's testimony, after comparing the many different stories that were told to the Senate and the media:

"If one wanted to believe that she had told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, one would have to believe that all of the other people who had offered conflicting testimony and evidence were incorrect, or simply lying: Diane Holt, Harry Singleton, John Doggett, Phyllis Berry-Myers, Andrew Fishel, Carlton Stewart, Stanley Grayson, Charles Kothe, Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post, Harriet Grant, Joe Biden, the two FBI agents, and all four of Hill's own witnesses -- Susan Hoerchner, John Carr, Ellen Wells, and Joel Paul. Alternatively, all of these individuals could have been correct, and Hill could have made more than a dozen false statements under oath."

The truth that emerges from Brock's account is that the Hill/ Thomas story had a simpler plot than we were led to believe at the time. The senators, their staffs and the journalists and activists on both sides overwhelmingly believed that the ends justified the means. For one side the goal was to deny Thomas a seat on the high court. For the other it was to assure his nomination. If that meant character assassination, so be it.

"Hill's supporters," Brock writes, "portrayed Thomas as a dangerous, ambitious, psychologically unbalanced, self-hating black, capable of boundless hypocrisy. Thomas's supporters, in turn, suggested that Hill was a fantasizing spinster put up to testifying by a sinister left-wing conspiracy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

New Expose on Anita Hill Worthy of Melodramatic Title
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.