U.S. Supreme Court Hearing Georgia Search Warrant and ADA Cases; in the Warrant Case, the Dispute Surrounds What to Do When Two Homeowners Disagree on Granting Permission to Search

By Eckenrode, Vicky | The Florida Times Union, November 6, 2005 | Go to article overview

U.S. Supreme Court Hearing Georgia Search Warrant and ADA Cases; in the Warrant Case, the Dispute Surrounds What to Do When Two Homeowners Disagree on Granting Permission to Search


Eckenrode, Vicky, The Florida Times Union


Byline: VICKY ECKENRODE

ATLANTA -- U.S. Supreme Court justices this week are scheduled to hear two Georgia cases that could clarify rules about granting permission for police searches and whether prisoners with disabilities can sue a state government.

In the fall term that started last month, the court has already heard arguments in areas such as physician-assisted suicide laws in Oregon and drug use in religious ceremonies in New Mexico.

Like those cases, decisions in the upcoming Georgia-based challenges could have far-reaching effects beyond the state's borders.

On Tuesday, the justices will hear arguments in Georgia vs. Scott Fitz Randolph, which could ultimately clear up conflicting opinions from lower courts about whose permission police need to conduct a search when they get mixed messages from the homeowners.

In July 2001, Janet Randolph called police to her house in Americus to report a domestic disturbance. When the authorities asked if they could search the house, she gave permission.

Her husband, Scott, also was there and objected to the search.

Police found cocaine residue inside the house, used it to get a search warrant and then found dozens of drug-related items, which led to Scott Randolph's arrest.

His lawyers sought to have the evidence suppressed, claiming the search was illegally conducted and violated his privacy rights.

The Georgia Supreme Court agreed when it issued its decision last year.

"The consent to conduct a warrantless search of a residence given by one occupant is not valid in the face of the refusal of another occupant who is physically present at the scene," Justice Robert Benham wrote in that decision.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled before that the co-owner of a residence can allow the police to enter because that is the risk a partner takes in living with another person. But that decision dealt with permission being given when the defendant is not home at the time of the search.

The Randolph case could provide direction about what police can do if both owners are home but have different responses for a search.

INMATE'S ADA CLAIMS

The day after the Randolph case is heard, the Supreme Court will field arguments from lawyers representing a Georgia inmate who wants to sue the state for claims of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In combined cases, the justices will weigh the limits of state immunity in United States vs. Georgia and Tony Goodman vs. Georgia.

Goodman, who was arrested in 1995 and convicted on aggravated assault and drug charges, said he was denied basic rights at the maximum-security prison in Reidsville.

Now held at the Augusta Medical State Prison, Goodman claims to be a paraplegic and unable to move his wheelchair in his former cell. He also claims to have received numerous injuries because of the prison's lack of handicapped-accessible features.

State corrections officials released a videotape of Goodman from earlier this year that shows him walking on his own. They also say that Georgia's prison system has made upgrades since the Americans with Disabilities Act's passage in 1990.

"Like people in the private sector and other government agencies, we've upgraded our facilities as time has gone on," said Bill Amideo, general counsel for the Georgia Department of Corrections. "We have spent money on ADA compliance for years. We have other inmates with disabilities around the state."

But neither Goodman nor the state has had a chance to argue the merits of the inmate's discrimination claims.

The case got stopped early on, because despite some exceptions, states are immune from lawsuits seeking monetary damages through the 11th Amendment. The amendment limits the jurisdiction of the federal judicial system to exclude any suit initiated by a person against a state government. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

U.S. Supreme Court Hearing Georgia Search Warrant and ADA Cases; in the Warrant Case, the Dispute Surrounds What to Do When Two Homeowners Disagree on Granting Permission to Search
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.