Testing the Limits of Industrial Hygiene

By LaBar, Gregg | Occupational Hazards, May 1993 | Go to article overview

Testing the Limits of Industrial Hygiene


LaBar, Gregg, Occupational Hazards


Workplace exposure limits are one of the industrial hygienist's most basic tools, but an increasing number of practitioners are concerned that the tool has now become a crutch.

When asked what they do for a living, industrial hygienists sometimes launch into a comprehensive explanation about how they manage worker health issues ranging from toxic chemical use and radiation to ergonomics and indoor air quality. When they want to keep the explanation simple, they say, "I do air monitoring" -- one of the most obvious, traditional functions of industrial hygiene.

"The idea of air monitoring and comparing the results to preset exposure limits is pretty easy for people to understand," said Ken Kushner, CIH, CSP, senior industrial hygienist at Timken Co., Canton, Ohio. "It's what has defined the profession for a long time."

In recent years, however, this foundation of industrial hygiene has come under unprecedented scrutiny, even attack. Critics note that exposure limits have uneven scientific underpinnings and are difficult to keep up-to-date. All too often, they charge, air monitoring is relied upon almost exclusively in deciding if working conditions are healthy or not, even though that goes beyond the intent of exposure limits.

To properly address occupational health, many experts stress, the use of exposure limits needs to be integrated with other important tools of the trade -- careful interpretation of monitoring results, overall workplace evaluation, engineering controls, and professional judgment.

"Exposure limits are attractive to hygienists because, as scientists, we like numbers," said Martha Waters, Ph.D., CIH, MPH, who directs NIOSH's exposure assessment methods group. "The danger lies in attributing too much power to these numbers. They are one tool in the industrial hygiene toolbox, but, without the other components, they really aren't that useful."

Discontent about the widespread use and misuse of PELs, RELs, TLVs, and WEELs is so high in some circles that a handful of people are pushing for radical change -- the abandonment of exposure limits altogether.

Eileen Senn, a CIH with a state health department, has been relentless in her attack on exposure limits, which she mocks as "industrial hygiene's sacred cow."

"We would be better off without the numbers because, nine times out of 10, they are misused to give some place a clean bill of health," charges Senn, whose views on "industrial hygiene with no limits" have made her something of a pariah in her own field and prevent her from naming the eastern state for which she works.

"Exposure limits justify exposures," Senn argues, "but the highest calling of industrial hygiene should be to reduce or eliminate exposures. Most IHs never get to reduce exposures by implementing controls because air monitoring almost never indicates an overexposure. Industrial hygienists are too dependent on exposure limits."

While Senn's overall views are shared by only a few people, many other professionals publicly and privately acknowledge that there are problems with the way exposure limits are developed and used. These people advocate the continued use of exposure limits combined with greater understanding of their basis and application of other tools.

"Exposure limits are one of our most significant contributions as a profession because there is no risk-free environment," says Morton Corn, Ph.D., professor and director of Johns Hopkins University's Div. of Environmental Health Engineering. "Despite all the work it's done, the profession hasn't done enough to explain what the numbers mean and how to use them. We're falling short in implementing an important concept."

The debate about the usefulness of exposure limits is so fundamental that some experts say the very identity of the industrial hygiene profession is at issue.

Playing the Numbers Game

OSHA, NIOSH, and two private organizations -- American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and American Industrial Hygiene Assn. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Testing the Limits of Industrial Hygiene
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.