Can Defense Research Revive U.S. Industry?

By Berkowitz, Bruce D. | Issues in Science and Technology, Winter 1992 | Go to article overview

Can Defense Research Revive U.S. Industry?


Berkowitz, Bruce D., Issues in Science and Technology


Probably not, but with better technology transfer it can at least contribute to commercial progress.

Even before the Cold War ended, public pressure was growing for the defense research and development (R&D) community to produce technologies with commercial applications. In part, these demands reflected the large investment that the United States has made in defense R&D ($39 billion funded by the Department of Defense |DOD~ in 1992, with an additional $3 billion spent by the Department of Energy for nuclear weapons research). These demands have intensified now that the Soviet threat has declined; commercial applications for defense R&D are commonly assumed to be part of the "peace dividend." Surely, the argument goes, the same minds that produced stealth technology and smart bombs can now help the United States win the trade wars in the international marketplace.

During the 1992 presidential campaign, Bill Clinton and George Bush both supported the idea of using defense research to improve U.S. competitiveness.

Yet experience suggests that converting defense R&D to civilian products and services may be more difficult than many believe. The defense community has been notoriously ineffective and inefficient in transferring technology to the private sector. And the evidence indicates that this performance has much less to do with the nature of defense technology than with the deep-seated organizational and cultural obstacles within the military that discourage and impede technology transfer.

An equally daunting impediment is the body of rules, regulations, standards, and specifications that govern the Defense Department's acquisition process. These policies make it virtually impossible for military products to be cost-competitive in commercial markets. They also prevent DOD from taking advantage of many commercial developments that would improve U.S. military capabilities.

The net result is that the commercial payoffs from defense R&D will never meet expectations unless we adopt policies to change the culture of defense research and facilitate the transfer of military technology to the commercial market. Defense spending may be falling, but the military will still consume a substantial share of U.S. R&D funding. The competitiveness of U.S. industry will depend greatly on whether we can transfer this know-how to the private sector. Defense officials will also find greater support for their R&D budgets if they can demonstrate significant commercial applications.

Past victories

Some defense technology has always found its way into civilian life. Certain innovations even provided the basis for entire industries. Canned food, for example, was originally used by Napoleon's armies, and more recently computers, jet engines, communications satellites, and jeeps were developed for the military.

Until recently, such spinoffs were considered fortuitous bonuses. It was understood that war--or in the case of the Soviet Union, conflict just short of war--often accelerated the rate at which technology evolved and that private industry could benefit. Yet there was little deliberate effort to introduce defense technology into the commercial arena.

Beginning in the late 1970s, some legislators began to argue that the government should promote, or at least facilitate, technology transfer. They were concerned that government-funded research was not producing enough return and that our global competitors--Japan and Germany in particular--would outpace U.S. companies in developing new products because such a large proportion of U.S. research spending was devoted to military work.

Table 1
Government-funded R&D: Where the money goes
(Percent, 1989)
                    U.S.    Japan   Germany   France   U.K.
Defense             65.5%    9.0      18.0     41.9    55.2
Health              12.9     4.8       5.2      3.7     6.2
Civil space          7. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can Defense Research Revive U.S. Industry?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.