From Soviet to Russian History

By Dukes, Paul | History Today, August 1993 | Go to article overview

From Soviet to Russian History

Dukes, Paul, History Today

At a recent international conference in Russia on the fate of |historical science' during the twentieth century, several native speakers denied that there was a crisis in their discipline. So far, they argued, in spite of many economic and social difficulties, there had been no significant interference in the freedom of enquiry and expression enjoyed by them since the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of 1991. To outside observers, this had some ring of truth -- just by comparing the proceedings of the April 1993 Moscow conference with another held there three years before. Then, some of the remarks had been guarded; now, there was little evident restraint.

On the other hand, a number of Russian colleagues asserted that there was indeed a crisis in the profession. First, they insisted, if they themselves received no salary, or academic publishers went broke, the market economy did indeed impinge upon their work. Secondly, they alleged, some archives were still effectively closed, and others were not easy to enter. Several specific examples were given, although there were protests from the audience that ways round the obstacles could be found. Thirdly, there were fears that Clio might be asked to become the handmaiden of the new state as she had been of the old. Would flattery of Russian leaders become as necessary as it had been for Soviet? Fourthly, and most seriously for several speakers, the former methodology of history had collapsed, and no replacement had yet been found.

Especially for those whose careers had been intimately connected with it, the departure of Marxism-Leninism has left a |scientific' vacuum. One member of the old guard complained that one of his postgraduate students, asked to begin a paper with an indication of his methodological approach, had dared to suggest that he would adopt his own. in order to avoid such youthful arrogance, and for more general purposes, the supervisor suggested a remedy in harmony with the spirit of the market economy, a prize of a million roubles for a new handbook of methodology. But one equally senior speaker expressed his full agreement with the empirical approach: take care of the details, he asserted, and the generalisations will take care of themselves.

Amen to that, many, even the majority of Western historians, would say, as they also bid a far from tearful farewell to Marxism-Leninism. A considerable number might well nod in assent as they observed their Russian colleagues taking up the concept of totalitarianism (for them one of the more acceptable generalisations?). On the other hand, somewhat ironically perhaps, a significant proportion of Western specialists in the history and social science of the Soviet Union have been turning from the totalitarian model as a less than satisfactory key to an explanation of events and developments in the USSR from 1917 to 1991. To put the point simply, such a model appears to represent what participants and observers hoped or feared would happen, rather than what did happen.

In a free world, with pluralist approaches to understanding, by all means let the totalitarian model thrive among those who find it satisfactory. However, there was and is at least an element of the thing itself in its application. In other words, there has been, even remains, the implication that those who have not accepted the totalitarian model are a little suspect, not quite sharing Western values. Such an attitude was reinforced throughout the years of the Cold War by a succession of Soviet dissidents, notably Alexander Solzhenitsyn (until he himself began to denounce Western values).

Let us be clear about this. Of course, the Soviet period of Russian history should not be whitewashed any more than denigrated. Of course, millions of innocents went to the gulag, and a large proportion of them perished. The conditions for those who survived were often appalling. But there was more to the Soviet Union, even during Stalin's years as leader, than repression and the gulag. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

From Soviet to Russian History


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.