Bears, Bulls, and Brokers: Employment Trends in the Securities Industry: Employment in the Securities Industry Strongly Correlates with Stock Market Value; However, Market Volume Does Not Exhibit the Same Relationship with the Employment Cycle

By Strople, Michael H. | Monthly Labor Review, December 2005 | Go to article overview

Bears, Bulls, and Brokers: Employment Trends in the Securities Industry: Employment in the Securities Industry Strongly Correlates with Stock Market Value; However, Market Volume Does Not Exhibit the Same Relationship with the Employment Cycle


Strople, Michael H., Monthly Labor Review


Over the past several years, Americans have dramatically increased the amount of personal savings held in equities. This phenomenon, together with a general shifting of savings from interest-bearing deposits and bonds to individual stocks and mutual funds, has peaked awareness in investing. A pronounced shift from defined-benefit retirement plans to employee-funded plans has placed workers' retirement nest eggs more directly in the stock markets. (1) The ebbs and flows of the stock market generate much attention from individual investors. However, these cycles also have a direct impact on workers in the securities industry.

As measured by the Current Employment Statistics survey, employment in securities, commodities contracts, and investments appears to be highly cyclical, rising and falling much like the markets themselves. (2) The industry experienced modest job declines during the 1990-91 recession, rebounded during the expansion of the mid-1990s into 2000, declined once again with the 2001 recession, then rebounded in late 2003. This article examines whether the higher participation in the stock market (measured by stock market volume) or stock values (measured by stock prices) have influenced the employment cycle.

Brokers: securities industry employment

Since January 1990, there have been two periods of sustained employment weakness in the securities industry--1990-91 and early 2001 through October 2003. Both of these time periods coincided with or followed economy-wide recessions, reflecting the general parallel between cycles in the securities industry and the business cycle.

The recession of the early 1990s, which the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) designated as lasting from July 1990 to March 1991, was mild in terms of job losses in the securities industry. (3) From the February 1990 employment peak to the February 1991 trough, the industry lost a modest 9,000 jobs, and then employment remained rather stagnant. By January 1992, employment had returned to its prerecession peak. So, while losses were mild over the recessionary period, the initial recovery was tepid at best.

After slow growth early in the recovery, employment in the securities industry experienced robust growth. From the employment trough in February 1991 (when the index was 98.2) to the March 2001 peak (when the index was 183.2), the industry gained more than 390,000 jobs, a nearly 87-percent increase. (See chart 1.) Over the same period, nonfarm employment increased by 22 percent. However, the growth rate in the securities industry was not evenly distributed across years. From 1992 to 1994, employment increased by an annualized 6.8 percent; in 1995, job growth slowed to 1.5 percent, while from 1995 to the employment peak in March 2001, growth accelerated to an annualized 7.8 percent.

The 1990's trend of strong employment growth differed considerably from the securities industry's experience after March 2001. Employment peaked in March 2001 and, by the trough in October 2003, the industry had shed 93,000 jobs, an 11-percent decrease. Like nonfarm employment, the securities industry's employment drop from peak to trough (31 months) lasted significantly longer than the 8-month recession. A series of factors in 2000 and 2001 exacerbated the impact of the economic downturn on the securities industry. First, the run-up in stock prices during the bull markets of the late 1990s led to fear that stocks were overvalued. This condition, also known as an asset-price bubble, had a clear impact on stock markets. (4) Within 1 year of its February 2000 peak, the bubble burst as the NASDAQ Index declined by more than 50 percent. The Standards & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) suffered a 25-percent decline over a similar timeframe. The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which resulted in the short-term closure of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), added momentum to markets already in decline. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bears, Bulls, and Brokers: Employment Trends in the Securities Industry: Employment in the Securities Industry Strongly Correlates with Stock Market Value; However, Market Volume Does Not Exhibit the Same Relationship with the Employment Cycle
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.