Recent Developments in Hungarian Archaeology

By Bokonyi, Sandor | Antiquity, March 1993 | Go to article overview

Recent Developments in Hungarian Archaeology

Bokonyi, Sandor, Antiquity

The Soviet Union and its satellite countries were not completely uniform. In spite of the fact that the USSR made every effort to change them to its own image, it failed because of the different characteristics of these nations derived from their ethnic backgrounds, history, way of life, religions, cultures and forms of political and scientific organizations.

The same held good in the field of scientific research. It is true that attempts were made to introduce organizational changes, which mainly aimed at standardization: e.g. the scientific degree system, which should have been the same throughout the whole eastern block. Nevertheless, they failed even in this because each country wanted to retain some of its original specialities.

In the field of scientific research the fundamental problem was that the Soviet model placed the national Academies in a central, organizing position. It is therefore not surprising that, as a result of the recent far-reaching political changes in these countries, changes in the role of the academies and their research institutes have become the central question. The structures of universities and museum organization have basically not changed apart from some shifts in importance and, of course, in their ideological backgrounds. Nevertheless, in both fields fundamental changes can be expected, although this is still a question of time.

Because of differences in the application of the Soviet model the recent changes have followed different courses in the countries of central and eastern Europe.

These changes have probably been least drastic in Hungary. The reason for this lies in the origin of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, on the one hand, and on the role it played between 1949 and 1989, on the other.

The Academy was founded not by a regime, government, or monarch but by a private person, Count Istvan Szechenyi, in 1825 (interestingly enough, his father was the founder of the National Museum in 1802). As a result, the Academy has always been an autonomous public body. Throughout its existence the communist regime interfered only twice: once in 1949, when it expelled a large number of the members of the 'old' Academy, and subsequently, when it kept an eye on the election of new members. This did not necessarily mean that members were selected only on the basis of political merit (i.e. party affiliation). However, election could be blocked on the basis of political 'misbehaviour' by the individual proposed for Academy membership.

The Academy institutes in principle followed the Soviet model, but they did not exceed their possibilities and did not try to exercise exclusive control over whole branches of science or humanities. Last but not at least there was a tradition of research institutes independent of the universities in Hungary: before the appearance of the Soviet model ten such institutes were functioning (the number has increased to 38), the earliest founded in 1902.

In spite of all these factors, broadside attacks were launched against the Academy institutes immediately after the political renewal. One group wanted to attach them to the universities, others wanted to make them independent, and others wanted to organize them into a national research network. Nobody has, however, yet produced a study demonstrating what kind of improvement in function would result from any of these reorganizations.

It was the joint efforts of the leadership of the Academy and the Rectors of the universities that ultimately found the solution. The essence of the solution is that the network of Academy institutes (though not necessarily all the institutes) would remain under the Academy. At the same time the Academy would hand over certain rights to the universities, and the institutes or some of their researchers would play a greater role in university teaching, particularly at graduate and postgraduate level.

This decision was based on the fact that in most countries two research networks have evolved: the university research base, and the system of the 'pure' research institutes, such as the Max Planck institutes in Germany, the institutes of CNRS in France, or those of CNR in Italy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Recent Developments in Hungarian Archaeology


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.