US Cultural Resource Management and the ICAHM Charter

By Elia, Ricardo J. | Antiquity, June 1993 | Go to article overview

US Cultural Resource Management and the ICAHM Charter


Elia, Ricardo J., Antiquity


Introduction

The ICAHM Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage was developed to serve as an international statement of principles and guidelines relevant to archaeological resources (Lund 1989: 15-17). The need for such a document is great: even a brief survey of archaeological heritage management systems throughout the world (e.g. Cleere 1984; 1989) reveals that no nation currently offers adequate protection to its archaeological heritage. To varying degrees, all nations fall short of realizing the ideals espoused in the Charter. The United States of America, despite having highly developed preservation legislation, regulations and procedures, a full-blown archaeological bureaucracy and more than 20 years of experience in cultural resource management, is no exception.

How does archaeological heritage management in the United States measure up to the standards and ideals expressed in the ICAHM Charter? The US system is highly complex, idiosyncratic and fundamentally flawed. While it can claim many successes, it must also assume responsibility for a number of failures and basic, persistent problems when viewed in the light of the ICAHM Charter. This survey of the US system reflects the order of topics in the ICAHM Charter.

Cultural Resource Management: the US system

The ICAHM Charter stresses the fragility of the archaeological resource base and states that the protection of the archaeological heritage must be completely integrated into 'policies relating to land use, development, and planning as well as cultural, environmental and educational policies'. Archaeological protection should become part of the planning process at every level -- local, regional, national, and international (Article 2). The Charter also emphasizes that protection must be based upon a systematic legislative regime that includes the principle that funding for the investigation of sites threatened by development projects be included in the costs of those projects (Article 3).

Unlike many countries that claim ownership of all archaeological resources in their territory (O'Keefe & Prott 1984: 189-97), the United States offers varying levels of legal protection to its archaeological heritage on the basis of land ownership. Owing to its federal system and the traditional primacy of private property rights in US law, archaeological resources on private land generally are the legal property of the landowner and are subject to no external control, although there are some important exceptions, e.g. federally assisted projects that involve private property, or, in some states, abandoned cemeteries and unmarked burials. On federally owned land the legal control over archaeological resources is strong and is supported by an intricate panoply of federal legislation, policies, and regulations. The protection of archaeological resources on land owned by the states varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; the states' authority lies somewhere between the clearly defined ownership of the federal government and the negligible protection afforded sites on private lands.

The different legal status accorded to cultural resources depending on the circumstance of land ownership is in large measure responsible for the current structure of the US preservation system, which comprises a complex, interdependent web of legal authority, administrative infrastructure, and activities that operate at the federal, state and local levels and within the private sector. The treatment of archaeological resources based on ownership is a critical weakness of the US system because only about one-third of the US land area is afforded the full protection of federal preservation law (and almost half of that one-third is in one state, Alaska). While some states have attempted to protect archaeological resources on private land, usually as part of a mandated environmental review process for proposed projects, comprehensive legal protection for sites on private property hardly seems a likely prospect in the near future. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

US Cultural Resource Management and the ICAHM Charter
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.