An Anecdote a Day Keeps Analysis Away: Gendered Relations of Power and an 'Academic Spoof.' (Views of Terry Eagleton on Modern Novels)

By Greenfield, Cathy; Williams, Peter | Hecate, May 1993 | Go to article overview

An Anecdote a Day Keeps Analysis Away: Gendered Relations of Power and an 'Academic Spoof.' (Views of Terry Eagleton on Modern Novels)


Greenfield, Cathy, Williams, Peter, Hecate


Terry Eagleton has argued that the burgeoning genre of the |campus' or |academic' novel usually features certain culturally significant family resemblances, the shifts and variations that those relations imply notwithstanding. These generic resemblances include the presentation of a university world characterised by political infighting and sexual intrigue, a world which can also be recognised by readers of such novels as a distillation of middle-class etiquette, habits and assumptions concerning such matters as greed, lust, hatred and even murder. Eagleton also notes the genre's usual construction of women characters as aggressive and often sexually voracious or as studious ingenues and concludes that, ironically, such reactionary, humanist texts actually provide ammunition for those who would subject universities to the cold, destructive winds of "market forces."(1)

The novel co-written by Peter Goldsworthy and Brian Matthews, Magpie,(2) is part of that genre profitably exploited by, among others, Vladimir Nabokov, Michael Innes, Tom Sharpe, David Lodge and Malcolm Bradbury and, with feminist variations, Amanda Cross and Valerie Miner (the latter also adding a socialist inflection). An infinitely playful text, something of a verbal mosaic, it "magpies," or borrows and collects, rewritings and references from some of these other writings so that informed readers can be persuaded to cooperate in the clever game of recognising intertextual echoes.(3) Its cover editorially classifies this local Adelaide cultural product as "Fiction/Humour/ Literary theory" and it has been greeted with generally very enthusiastic reviews. For instance, these publicly available and perhaps authoritatively persuasive readings have terined Magpie "a playful tilt at post-modernism";(4) "possibly an authentic picture of that joyous phantasmagoria that is Adelaide";(5) "an offhand attempt at a comic novel that won't do anyone any harm";(6) "a genial jeu de fete" and, because launched at the Adelaide Festival of Arts Writers' Week, "a seasonally apt reminder of the pleasures of the text";(7) as a novel that causes "a fair bit of Rack for Peter and me to dodge";(8) on a rare but salutary cautionary note, "the written equivalent of that strange ritual of sparring and backslapping indulged in by male intellectuals during the footy season";(9) and as a "skilfully contrived story-within-a-story."(10)

The novel having been widely reviewed, we are not concerned here with summarising structure and plot(11) or with aesthetic evaluations of literary style. Nor are we interested in casting aspersions, allocating praise or blame to the widely esteemed authors or to the vigorous, often innovative local publisher. Without wishing to overestimate the social and political effects of a genre such as the campus/academic novel or a single text such as Magpie and for all the latter's clever interweaving of different narrative voices and the accompanying characterology, there is a worrying cousensus (or lack of difference) effected by the techniques of construction and presentation of women characters and the gender relations into which they are inserted and by which they are (here fictively) subjected. That is, we are registering concerns with the compositional presentations and possible plausible readings of gendered relations of power, and with the readerly use of conventions for the production and attachment of meanings, uses which are historically formed, socially organised, culturally communicated and, last but not least, politically charged.

So, we ask, what might readers make of Magpie's compositional statements concerning women? Jokes? parody/metafiction? irony? realistic presentation? the hoary old excuse of masculinist literary and sexual imaginative fantasy? or, recognisable notations ripe (to use the novel's preferred organicist imagery) for use and repetition elsewhere in situations beyond the control and, perhaps, imagination of even the most genial and fair-minded writers? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Anecdote a Day Keeps Analysis Away: Gendered Relations of Power and an 'Academic Spoof.' (Views of Terry Eagleton on Modern Novels)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.