The Way Forward: Georgia's Democratic Vision for the Future

By Saakashvili, Mikheil | Harvard International Review, Spring 2006 | Go to article overview

The Way Forward: Georgia's Democratic Vision for the Future


Saakashvili, Mikheil, Harvard International Review


Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Georgia inherited a wide array of challenges inherent to the post-Soviet political, economic, and geopolitical landscape: entrenched corruption, unaccountable political elites, external manipulation, a lack of energy security, ethnic discord, and a government unable to pursue comprehensive reforms. The country also inherited something new for fledgling post-Soviet states: choices. Independence brought new opportunities for economic and political revitalization and also demanded that leaders form a comprehensive vision for the national future--a duty that had not rested in Tbilisi's hands for seven decades.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Georgia both benefited and suffered from the collapse of the Soviet Union. It benefited because freedom and independence are inherently preferable to tyranny and central control. It suffered because, in the first decade after independence, Georgian leaders were unable to chart a strategic course for achieving national goals. In the ensuing political and economic vacuum, state weakness was easily exploited by foreign manipulation, domestic vigilantism, and criminal plundering.

Although chaotic and unforeseen, the collapse of the Soviet Union is generally viewed as relatively bloodless. Yet Georgia experienced a disproportionate share of violence in the massacre of pro-independence protesters during the tail end of the Gorbachev years and in the separatist conflict and civil war that ravaged the country through the early 1990s. The war in Abkhazia alone killed thousands, displaced one quarter-million Georgians from their homes, and swiftly deteriorated the quality of life for the diverse peoples of Abkhazia. The price paid for Tbilisi's failure to demonstrate a better path was immense. These various challenges contributed to Georgia's post-Soviet choice being sidelined, as the country limped along with little hope of reviving from a decade of stagnation.

A Georgian Vision

The Rose Revolution of November 2003 marked a turning point in Georgia's modern history. It showed that the Georgian people did not lose the ability to choose for themselves the path for their future. Georgians exhibited unity and discipline, armed only with the belief that through fairness, equality, and determination, their country could regain its prosperity and dignity. As the protests grew and the awareness of the magnitude of the movement spread, it became clear that the people of Georgia were not merely protesting electoral fraud; we were coming together to right the mistakes of the past and transform society.

Two years after the Rose Revolution, Georgia is a transformed country, part of an emerging Black Sea region characterized by the advancement of democracy and robust economic growth. The return of the rule of law, human rights, transparency, and the delivery of basic public services signifies that Georgia can respond to the challenges posed by democratic governance. Finally, Georgians are making positive choices that are moving the country out of the shadow of its past. Georgia has provided the region and the world with a profoundly hopeful story--a story of nationwide participation, resurgence, and the irresistible power of democracy. Not least of all, we have proven to ourselves that we have the power to transform our society, which means there is no excuse for the failure to do so. Today, Georgia is no longer merely "post-Soviet" but is realizing its role as a Black Sea nation with a European future.

The Fight Against Corruption

Before the Rose Revolution, the authorities passively accepted corruption as an inherent part of Georgia's economic and political system. We have rejected this outright. While a lack of accountability once allowed corruption to flourish at all levels of government, Georgia is no longer a corrupt state. Though corruption has not been totally eradicated, our anti-corruption strategy, rooted in the disciplined application of the rule of law, has changed the rules of the game to provide a fundamental accountability that brings corruption to light and makes it unsustainable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Way Forward: Georgia's Democratic Vision for the Future
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.