Charting a Course for Cooperation in Space

By Logsdon, John M. | Issues in Science and Technology, Fall 1993 | Go to article overview

Charting a Course for Cooperation in Space

Logsdon, John M., Issues in Science and Technology

Writing in Issues five years ago ("Leadership through Cooperation," Summer 1988), I suggested that "across-the-board U.S. preeminence [in space] is no longer a realistic aspiration," and that "given the realities in which the U.S. space program must operate--a very successful and much more open Soviet space program, Europe and Japan pursuing their independence of action through developing autonomous space capabilities, and similarity in goals and tight budget constraints for all space powers--a U.S. space strategy that emphasizes international collaboration makes better sense."

Much has changed since 1988, and not for the better from the perspective of advocates of an ambitious future in space. The Soviet space program has given way to a Russian effort that searches the world for those willing to pay in hard currency for its services or hardware. Europe has retreated from its quest for autonomy and now stresses enhanced cooperation as its path to the future. Slow budget growth, reflecting a lack of consensus on future payoffs from space, has constrained Japan's ambitions, and persistent technical problems with new launchers have set back its space program by several years at least.

In the United States, President Clinton has directed National Aeronautics and Space Administration head Daniel Goldin to "redesign NASA." This is just the latest move in a lengthy process of bringing NASA's programs and performance into step with the realities of today's international situation and with current and future U.S. interests in space, rather than hoping for a second coming of something like the Cold War competitive thrust that fueled the U.S. race to the moon. Goldin has declared the Apollo era "history" and is determined to reconstitute NASA as a much more productive organization.

Thus, at least for the next decade, the world's civilian space programs will have to make do with slowly growing or level budgets and diminished priority. In this situation, fostering international collaboration in space as a key element of U.S. space strategy makes even more sense than it did in 1988. As world leaders rethink their reasons for supporting major effects in space, there is a strategic opportunity to obtain new and expanded commitments to joint space undertakings.

This opportunity should be pursued for idealistic and pragmatic reasons. Among the idealistic motives is a belief that cooperative activities in space will contribute to a world in which longtime allies and former enemies can develop experience in working together in the common interest. By creating a web of international relationships, such experience can help counter tendencies toward restructuring post-Cold War international relations in terms of competing economic, political, and security blocs. From a pragmatic perspective, collaboration will allow a pooling of scarce financial and technical resources to carry out programs that are already on the space agenda; in addition, cooperative arrangements may be the only way in which large-scale new projects can be initiated and sustained.

In particular, the United States should seek a leading role in shaping future collaborations. In the past, the dominant U.S. position in space made co-operation optional. But now, the United States must either lower its ambitions in space or achieve them through collective action. Given this situation, the continuing desire to use space as an arena for demonstrating U.S. leadership, and the reality that other countries now approach--and in some areas surpass--the United States in space technology, this nation will have to rethink its approach to international space relationships.

Altered contexts

During the 1980s, space agency officials and industrial and academic leaders developed expansive plans for the future in space, particularly in the areas of human space exploration and the infrastructure to support it. Today, however, the link between those plans and various important national interests is not as clear as it once was. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Charting a Course for Cooperation in Space


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.