Problems with Minimalism

By Sunstein, Cass R. | Stanford Law Review, April 2006 | Go to article overview

Problems with Minimalism


Sunstein, Cass R., Stanford Law Review


INTRODUCTION
I. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, RULES, AND TRANSPARENCY
II. RULES, STANDARDS, AND MINIMALISM
     A. Minimalism and Its Discontents
     B. The Case for Rules?
         1. In defense of rules
         2. Meta-questions
         3. Minimalism's domain
III. DEMOCRACY
CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

Consider two admissions programs:

* Program A gives a specified number of points to every African-American applicant. More particularly, every such applicant receives ten points, simply by virtue of being African-American. Ten points are not trivial, but they are far from enough to ensure admission. Children of alumni, for example, receive fifteen points; specified academic achievements produce thirty points; athletic accomplishments result in the addition of fifteen points. Admission is unlikely unless an applicant receives at least sixty points.

* Program B dispenses with a point system. Every applicant receives individualized consideration from one of eight admissions officers. In hard cases, the admissions officers meet in "teams" of three; in the hardest cases, all eight admissions officers meet as a group. For African-American applicants, race counts as a plus, though numbers are not assigned.

Under existing law, Program A is unconstitutional because it is too rule-bound. (1) Program B is permissible because it calls for "holistic" consideration of individual applicants. (2) More than anyone else, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor is responsible for the fact that constitutional law distinguishes so sharply between the two programs. While Justice O'Connor and Justice Breyer voted to strike down a variation on Program A and to uphold a variation on Program B, (3) the seven other Justices would treat the two the same, either upholding or invalidating both programs. (4)

Consistent with its general opposition to rigid affirmative action programs, the Court has long made clear that educational institutions cannot "insulat[e] each category of applicants with certain desired qualifications from competition with all other applicants." (5) Extending that principle, the Court has also invalidated a point system, analogous to Program A, used for undergraduate admissions at the University of Michigan. (6) In that system, students received a specified set of points for various attributes, including academic performance (up to 110 points), in-state residence (ten points), having alumni parents (four points), athletic recruitment (twenty points), and being a member of an underrepresented minority group (twenty points). (7)

The Court did not rule that the twenty points were too high; it ruled instead that a point system, in the context of racial preference, is invalid as such. The Court stressed "the importance of considering each particular applicant as an individual, assessing all of the qualities that the individual possesses, and in turn, evaluating that individual's ability to contribute to the unique setting of higher education." (8) The problem with the point system is that its automatic nature simply does not allow for individualized consideration. And the easy administrability of this automatic system does not constitute an adequate excuse, for "the fact that the implementation of a program capable of providing individualized consideration might present administrative challenges does not render constitutional an otherwise problematic system." (9)

By contrast, in Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice O'Connor wrote the Court's opinion permitting educational institutions to create affirmative action programs if they do not assign points or impose quotas but merely include race as a "plus" within a system of highly individualized judgment. (10) At least such programs are acceptable if they remain "flexible enough to ensure that each applicant is evaluated as an individual." (11) Hence, the Court permits raceconscious admissions if, in the words of Justice O'Connor's opinion, there is "a highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file, giving serious consideration to all the ways an applicant might contribute to a diverse educational environment. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Problems with Minimalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.