You Say You (Don't) Want a Revolution the Resistance to Digital Cinema in Australia: The Digital Cinema Revolution Is upon Us. Championing Its Rollout Is the Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI), a Joint Venture between Some of the United States' Largest Motion Picture Studios; Disney, Fox, MGM, Paramount, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Universal and Warner Bros

By Gadd, Natasha | Metro Magazine, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview

You Say You (Don't) Want a Revolution the Resistance to Digital Cinema in Australia: The Digital Cinema Revolution Is upon Us. Championing Its Rollout Is the Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI), a Joint Venture between Some of the United States' Largest Motion Picture Studios; Disney, Fox, MGM, Paramount, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Universal and Warner Bros


Gadd, Natasha, Metro Magazine


FOUNDED IN 2002, the DCI's main objective was to establish a digital cinema framework that would ensure a universally standardized model for technical performance, reliability and quality control. With only approximately 600 screens installed worldwide to date, it is still unclear what impact digital cinema will have on the global film market. What is certain is that, like many technologies preceding it, the introduction of digital cinema will polarize the international industry and generate heated debate about its value.

Since the Internet revolutionized mass communication, major technological developments have been accompanied by utopian visions of social change. But for all the predictions of a paperless society and the global village, new technologies often fail to meet such grandiose expectations. For the proponents of digital cinema--most of whom, especially the motion picture consortiums and digital technology giants, have a vested financial interest in its implementation--this new technology is now capable of ending celluloid's 100 year reign over film production, distribution and exhibition. One of the most famous advocates for conversion from celluloid to digital is Star Wars creator George Lucas. Before releasing Star Wars: Episode 11--Attack of the Clones (George Lucas, 2002), Lucas declared that the film would only be screened in cinemas equipped with digital projection facilities. But with so few cinema screens fitted out for digital delivery, Lucas later swallowed his words and released the film globally on 35mm film prints.

In September 2005, the Digital Cinema Initiative aims to deliver recommendations for industry-wide standards, at which stage the official rollout of the new technology will commence. Currently there are only two screens in Australia with high-end digital projection facilities: Hoyts at Fox Studios in Sydney and the Australian Centre for the Moving Image (ACMI) in Melbourne. For Andre Bernard, ACMI's Cinema Technical Manager, digital cinema is a complex concept and one that is often misunderstood:

There are so many tags for digital cinema, such as e-cinema and d-cinema and at the moment it can refer to everything from a $10,000 LCD projector to a high-tech plant valued at half a million dollars and everything in between. It is this quantum gap and the loose use of language that causes much of the confusion.

For Bernard, Hoyts is the only digital cinema in this country that is permanently set up to exploit the possibilities of the technology by delivering digital content via a server. Bernard sees the slow development of digital cinema in Australia as a combined result of the lack of technical standards, the small market for manufacturers to sell into, the lack of digital features available, and the high costs of conversion, particularly for independent and regional exhibitors.

Robert Ward, an independent exhibitor with interests in hundreds of screens across Australia, including Australian Country Cinemas and Cmax Entertainment, believes he has a solution. Over the past seven years, Ward has followed the developments in digital cinema with great interest and is currently assisting Cinematica, a US/UK-based organization, with the rollout of digital cinema in Australia. Local exhibitors, however, are not as enthusiastic, with many believing it is the distributors and film studios that stand to benefit from the conversion.

One of the biggest points of contention has been who will pay for the costs of hardware, installation and maintenance of digital cinema. Cinematica has devised a business model that will see these costs shared between the various stakeholders, with the exhibitor bearing the smallest load. Cinematica is proposing to fit out Australian cinemas with digital projection plants valued at US$150,000, which will be then leased to distributors on a'screen week' basis. Under this new model, for example, 20th Century Fox would rent a cinema from Rialto Cinemas for one screen week at $300-$350, approximately the same costs the distributor would be paying to the studio for a 35mm print. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

You Say You (Don't) Want a Revolution the Resistance to Digital Cinema in Australia: The Digital Cinema Revolution Is upon Us. Championing Its Rollout Is the Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI), a Joint Venture between Some of the United States' Largest Motion Picture Studios; Disney, Fox, MGM, Paramount, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Universal and Warner Bros
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.