The Conservative Moral Philosophy of Scheler and Kolnai

By McAleer, Graham | Modern Age, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

The Conservative Moral Philosophy of Scheler and Kolnai


McAleer, Graham, Modern Age


EDMUND HUSSERL was the source of the principal philosophical movement of the twentieth century: phenomenology. The most important continental European philosophers of the century just past were all linked to the phenomenological movement to some degree or other. The greatest of these, Martin Heidegger, is infamous for cutting his ties with Husserl in order to curry favor with the Nazis. Heidegger in turn has been roundly criticized by such phenomenologists as Paul Ricoeur and Emmanuel Levinas for his failure to develop any kind of ethical theory. This intellectual failure, they argue, explains Heidegger's own moral failure of sympathizing and actively collaborating with the Nazis.

Although phenomenology was still a very young philosophical school when Heidegger first flashed across the world of academic philosophy, ethics and phenomenology had nonetheless already come together in a remarkably fertile way. What is often referred to as the Munich School of phenomenology had concentrated from the start on moral and legal theory, and most famously so in the figure of Max Scheler, a man of brilliant intellect but febrile character. (1) It is widely acknowledged that Scheler (1874-1928) was the premier phenomenologist to have developed an ethical theory, a distinctive and highly original value theory. He presented his ideas in 1913 in his enormous and difficult work, Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. (2)

It is an interesting fact that those phenomenologists who developed original moral theories all created conservative ones. A superb phenomenologist like Merleau-Ponty, who is extremely popular in philosophy departments today, simply grafted his Marxist political and ethical commitments onto his phenomenology; the same can be said of thinkers more loosely related to phenomenology, such as Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida. But where truly original ethical thinking is found among phenomenologists, it always takes on a conservative hue. Today, Levinas is far more studied than is Scheler: of all the phenomenologists Levinas is certainly the most "popular" in the contemporary university. This is quite remarkable, for his biblically oriented ethics is undoubtedly conservative, centering as it does around issues of maternity and paternity. Despite all his sophistication, Levinas uses these ideas in a quite straightforward way to talk about the duties and responsibilities of parents. For a conservative philosopher, it is a delight to watch liberal and feminist commentators on Levinas--and they are legion--trying to hold on to his post-Heideggerian ethical reasoning while gutting his thinking of its essentials lest he unsettle their basic commitments.

Though eclipsed today by Levinas, Scheler remains a tremendous resource for conservative ethics. It is probably fair to say that until the mid-1960s Scheler's star was still rising, especially in Christian circles. He was foundational to the development of personalism as a philosophical anthropology, and personalism remains basic to Catholic social thought. Although Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II was often identified as part of the Munich School, already by the mid-1960s he was distancing himself from Scheler; late in his life, he spoke very favorably of Levinas. This, however, has nothing to do with Scheler's having become an apostate--as some maintain--and much more to do with the centrality of biblical norms in contemporary Christian ethics.

Scheler, though very much a Catholic when he wrote his ethics, always stood in the tradition of Catholic realism, his vigorously objective value ethics standing as an elaboration of an autonomous moral law. He did not aspire to be a moral theologian, but rather, a moral philosopher. If interest in Scheler is to be re-freshened, it might be sparked by putting him in contact with another member of his school, the Hungarian phenomenologist Aurel Kolnai (1900-1973).

Like Scheler, Kolnai was born a Jew and converted to Catholicism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Conservative Moral Philosophy of Scheler and Kolnai
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.