Albany Law Review Symposium: Refinement or Reinvention, the State of Reform in New York: The Courts

By Kaye, Judith S. | Albany Law Review, Summer 2006 | Go to article overview

Albany Law Review Symposium: Refinement or Reinvention, the State of Reform in New York: The Courts


Kaye, Judith S., Albany Law Review


FEBRUARY 10, 2006

I'd like to begin by explaining my presence, as well as my absence, today.

First, my presence. The Law Review's invitation was an irresistible one. To be part of a program on state government reform--what an exciting subject for me in my administrative and judicial roles as Chief Judge, to say nothing of my interest as a citizen. I was intrigued also by the opportunity for me to step back and look at the reform process within the Judicial Branch with as much objectivity as I could muster. With my day-to-day calendar being what it is, I don't have much opportunity to do that. And it is always a pleasure to visit the Law School, a second home here in Albany.

That the Court of Appeals is in Session this week and next partly explains my absence this morning, and my inability to linger with you through the afternoon. Our court conferences every morning throughout the Session, as we did this morning, and I now have a second week of fascinating cases ahead to prepare. "Fascinating cases" are another reason I feel uncomfortable joining in this afternoon's discussion. Some of our decisions may be on the table today, being mercilessly dissected; of even greater concern, you may be addressing issues that are on their way to us, and I don't want to have to disqualify myself. And sadly, the death of former Court of Appeals Judge Matthew Jasen requires that I travel to Buffalo to attend his funeral tomorrow morning. So with your indulgence, I would like to tell you about some ongoing and proposed reforms within the Third Branch, and some of the tools we use to pursue them--and then I plan to head off to the airport, along with a briefcase filled with next week's cases.

I should say right at the outset that, while decisions of the state's high court are obviously part of the process of reforming government--that is what checks and balances are all about--I will most decidedly not be discussing our cases, but rather will leave that to others. I will stick to reform of the Third Branch, which is a sufficiently large and indigestible subject. Just last Monday, in my State of the Judiciary message, I put an entire courtroom to sleep covering only highlights of 2005. (1)

It seems appropriate to begin by introducing myself and my institution. I grew up in Monticello, New York, graduated from Barnard College and New York University Law School, and practiced commercial litigation for twenty-one years in New York City law firms in cases involving mergers, acquisitions, securities fraud, breached contracts, and the like. I dreamed large to be sure, but never fantasized that I might someday head the Third Branch of New York State government. In 1983 came the miracle of my appointment to the Court of Appeals by Governor Mario Cuomo, and ten glorious years later, a second miracle: Governor Cuomo appointed me Chief Judge, a 14-year term that regrettably draws to a close in March 2007. With the position of Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals came a second title, a second box of stationery--Chief Judge of the State of New York--and new duties as head of the Judicial Branch. That role includes oversight of more than 360 courthouses across the state, 16,000 employees, 1,200 state-paid judges, case dockets that number in the millions annually, and a budget hopefully always equal to our awesome responsibilities.

I. AN OVERVIEW OF THE THIRD BRANCH

Being Chief Judge means leading the Judiciary, which as we all learned long ago is a separate, co-equal branch of government. Obviously intrinsic to the faithful exercise of the judicial function is the separation--the independence--of the Judiciary to assure complete integrity in its judgments, untainted by "control or coercive influence" of the other branches (2) or by the whim of the majority. Judicial independence is essential to our system of checks and balances, essential to protecting our fundamental rights and liberties, and thus an essential premise of reform in the courts. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Albany Law Review Symposium: Refinement or Reinvention, the State of Reform in New York: The Courts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.