K-State Problem Identification Rating Scales for College Students

By Robertson, John M.; Benton, Stephen L. et al. | Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, October 2006 | Go to article overview

K-State Problem Identification Rating Scales for College Students


Robertson, John M., Benton, Stephen L., Newton, Fred B., Downey, Ronald G., Marsh, Patricia A., Benton, Sheryl A., Tseng, Wen-Chih, Shin, Kang-Hyun, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development


The K-State Problem Identification Rating Scales, a new screening instrument for college counseling centers, gathers information about clients' presenting symptoms, functioning levels, and readiness to change. Three studies revealed 7 scales: Mood Difficulties, Learning Problems, Food Concerns, Interpersonal Conflicts, Career Uncertainties, Self-Harm Indicators, and Substance/Addiction Issues.

**********

Effective treatment planning for psychotherapy requires a reliable and valid assessment of the problems that need to be addressed. For more than 90% of medium to large university counseling centers, this diagnostic process is set in motion when the client is given a brief checklist of symptoms (Zalaquett, 1996). Often completed in the waiting room, these intake checklists provide counselors with an initial screening of common problem areas that might need a more detailed assessment by the clinician. This practice is not novel to counseling centers; many physicians also ask their patients to endorse various problem areas on a checklist before beginning the clinical interview in the examining room.

Checklists function to identify symptoms that need to be explored further, either during the clinical interview itself or through the judicious use of standardized diagnostic instruments. These three resources--an intake checklist, the clinical interview, and selected standardized assessment instruments--enable the counselor to develop a diagnostic impression that leads to appropriate treatment plans and strategies.

Two factors in the current university climate underline the importance of using an intake screening instrument that is both reliable and valid. First, college counseling centers are reporting an increase in the demand for services from students with more complex and serious problems (Benton, Robertson, Tseng, Newton, & Benton, 2003; Gallagher, Gill, & Sysco, 2000; O'Malley, Wheeler, Murphey, O'Connell, & Waldo, 1990; Robbins, May, & Corazzini, 1985). At the same time, counseling center psychologists are experiencing higher demands from university administrators for evidence of the efficacy and efficiency of psychotherapy services (Hiebert, 1997; Stewart & Cairn, 2002). Psychologists and other mental health specialists working in counseling centers must therefore respond to two pressure points: students who are struggling with severe difficulties and administrators who are making decisions about university budget cuts and belt-tightening measures. In this context, it makes both therapeutic and economic sense to begin the assessment process with a psychometrically sound screening instrument that identifies problems needing a more thorough assessment.

INTAKE MEASURES

The checklists currently used in college counseling centers vary widely in length, quality, and evidence of psychometric examination (Zalaquett, 1996). Several checklists have been subjected to factor analysis, including the Mooney Problem Checklist (Mooney & Gordon, 1950), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (Derogatis, 1993), and the Brief Symptom Inventory (Derogatis & Melisaratos, 1983). In addition, several other authors have reported results of factor analyses on unpublished problem checklists used in university counseling centers (e.g., Bauman & Lenox, 2000; Miller & Rice, 1993; Zalaquett & McManus, 1996).

These problem checklists have several advantages. They are easy for clients to complete. They take little client time, and they enable psychologists to effectively scan a wide variety of client concerns. Furthermore, checklists allow clients to endorse sensitive items that they might not readily report in an interview, and they also may prepare clients for the intake interview by focusing attention on specific symptoms.

However, the checklist format does have some important disadvantages. For example, the yes/no format used by most checklists is less sensitive than a rating scale approach to gauging the severity of a symptom. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

K-State Problem Identification Rating Scales for College Students
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.