E-Rulemaking: Bringing Data to Theory at the Federal Communications Commission

By de Figueiredo, John M. | Duke Law Journal, March 2006 | Go to article overview

E-Rulemaking: Bringing Data to Theory at the Federal Communications Commission


de Figueiredo, John M., Duke Law Journal


ABSTRACT

This Article examines the theoretical promise of e-rulemaking with an examination of data about all filings at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from 1999 to 2004. The Article first reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on e-rulemaking. It then analyzes a dataset of all filings at the FCC using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to determine what drives e-filings and whether the theoretical promise of e-rulemaking is being realized six years into the experiment. The Article finds that though there has indeed been a long-term trend away from paper filings and toward electronic filings, citizen participation seems not to have increased from earlier time periods. Rather, e-filing at the FCC has resulted in a marginal change to the rulemaking process and is merely another avenue by which interested parties file comments.

INTRODUCTION

With the advent of the Internet, the federal government sought to computerize and digitize administrative agencies' documents and the rulemaking process in the United States. Plans were laid out (1) and money appropriated to begin the process of computerizing rulemaking to reduce paper in the bureaucracy, (2) increasing citizen participation and deliberation in the rulemaking process, and speeding and enhancing the subsequent creation of administrative rules across the entire administrative apparatus. (3) Beginning in the late 1980s, the federal government began commissioning studies to examine the application of information technology to different aspects of government record-keeping and rulemaking. (4) In 1998, with much fanfare, the Department of Transportation rolled out the first online, department-wide, regulatory docket, providing full access to all studies, comments, and other documents contained in the agency's rulemaking records. This system also allowed the public to submit comments on all rules proposed by the department. (5) Later, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and a host of other agencies developed their own systems for computerizing the deliberative rulemaking process. Thus was born electronic rulemaking, or "e-rulemaking."

Since the 1990s, the federal government at all levels has expressed a commitment to electronic rulemaking as a way to cut costs, enhance the deliberative process, and democratize the regulatory process with increased citizen participation. Congress has appropriated money, agencies have dedicated personnel, and task forces have been created. Indeed, a recent initiative has sought to integrate and streamline e-rulemaking through interagency working groups, standardized electronic interfaces, and common back-office systems. (6)

This Article will evaluate whether e-rulemaking has made progress toward achieving its goals seven years into the experiment. Although the theoretical promise of e-rulemaking has been great, it is difficult to determine the success of electronic efforts because papers that have examined much more than case-study data are scarce. (7) Those that have examined larger data sets are of two types: either they are confined to one or two dockets, or they rely upon survey data. (8) While these papers use valid research methods, these methods have drawbacks. Papers that examine only one or two dockets usually select a docket where there have been thousands of comments filed. Unfortunately, these types of dockets are not representative of the average docket before an agency--which may receive fewer than 100 filings. (9) It thus may be difficult to make generalizations from these single-docket studies. Papers that rely upon survey data face a different challenge. Researchers ask parties a series of questions about a comment many months after the filing has been made, creating a problem of hindsight bias. What both of these methods do offer, however, is an evaluation of the influence of e-rulemaking at a very microscopic level of data, which is difficult using other methods. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

E-Rulemaking: Bringing Data to Theory at the Federal Communications Commission
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.