The Car of the Year (and a Half): The Ford Mustang Changed the Industry When Its Creator Realized "People Want Economy So Badly They Don't Care What They Pay Fort It"
Patton, Phil, American Heritage
THE CAR WAS INTRODUCED ON Friday, April 17, 1964, at the New York World's Fair. But in another sense it had been born one Sunday in the late 1950s, when Robert McNamara, then president of the Ford Motor Company, sat in church and sketched out the specifications for a new car. The result was the Ford Falcon, the practical, reasonable compact car that sold 400,000 units when it was introduced for the 1960 model year.
The other Ford bosses hated it, none more than Lee Iacocca, Ford's supersalesman. It was a dull car with few options to swell profit margins and make salesmen happy, Iacocca and other executives, among them Ford's product planner, Donald Frey, had noticed something else. The Falcon's compact-car rival from Chevrolet was the Corvair (not yet tarnished by Ralph Nader's safety criticism). One model of the Corvair sold especially well: the higher-powered, bucket-seat-equipped, sporty Monza. If Ford could take the dull but dependable Falcon and convert it into a sports compact like the Monza, it could add profits to sales.
The result, the Mustang, was launched with a level of publicity and anticipation no car had seen since Henry Ford's Model A. Ford took 22,000 orders the first day and sold some 400,000 the first year. "The sports car for the masses," Life magazine called it (although with four seats, it was really a sporty car, not a sports car).
The Mustang took the platform--the bones and basics--of the sturdy Falcon. Donald Frey later declared that the Mustang was done as simply and cheaply as possible. He called it a "happy car, easy to develop and build, one of those once-in-a-lifetime things where everything went together right the first time."
The price was just $2,368, not much more than that of a VW Beetle, but it was sold as "the car you design yourself," with a long list of options. The average customer checked off many of them; after all, the car was so cheap. Eventually, the average buyer was spending $1,000 on options.
Iacocca had understood something new: "People want economy so badly they don't care how much they pay for it." Cheap fun: Was there any formula that appealed more to Americans? The "youth market" was a demographic reality. Half of all new car sales in the next decade, the company's researchers declared, would come from customers under 30.
It is hard to recall today what a big deal "bucket seats" were in 1964. The very phrase resonated. Bucket seats spoke of independence, if not adventure, in contrast with the practical family "bench" seat.
Gene Bordinat, head of styling at Ford, set up a competition among three studios to come up with a design. The name Mustang had already been used on a sexy show car. It was borrowed not from the horse but from the World War II P-51 fighter plane.
The design was approved in August 1962. The winning effort, by Joe Oros, Fail Halderman, and David Ash, took elements of the Ford Thunderbird and Lincoln Continental Mark II combined with a projecting grille, side vents, and rear fender "hips," and it looked like nothing else on the road. With long hood and short rear-deck proportions and lines that were crisp, clean, and modern, the car was like a pop song with a catchy hook.
It also seemed in keeping with the fashion of the day, the tall-boot and miniskirt look. Indeed, the Mustang seemed just the car for the growing number of single workingwomen. But like a good pop song, it could be played in many ways, "covered" in different styles.
It was planned, produced, and introduced in the shadow of Ford's Edsel debacle of 1958, and every bit of bad luck that seemed to have afflicted the former was reversed with the latter. Its introduction was a masterly piece of publicity and marketing. …