Can We Learn from Irish History?

By Redmond, Robert S. | Contemporary Review, April 1994 | Go to article overview

Can We Learn from Irish History?


Redmond, Robert S., Contemporary Review


CAN the Downing Street Declaration signed last December by the Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic lay the foundations of a permanent peace in the island of Ireland? There are grounds for optimism provided there are cool heads and a determination on the part of politicians to avoid the quick fix. So many sad mistakes have been made in the past. One must hope that lessons will have been learned.

Above all, the political parties in both countries must, somehow, accept that the next generation is far more important than the next general election. Long term solutions are needed and must be sought. It is time to reflect that the Treaty of 1922 which set up what was then known as The Irish Free State and the Province of Northern Ireland has cast long shadows. Too many of the constitutional problems with us today stem directly from mistakes made with the best intentions seven decades ago. All could well be lost again in the long term unless everyone works together with goodwill to exploit an opportunity which seems to be there. This time, the result must be permanent and inviolate.

In particular, partition was seen by the then British Government as no more than a temporary expedient. Everyone, (with the possible exception of the Tory leader Bonar Law, who was happy with the idea of entrenching the Unionist hold on Ulster), seems to have expected that given time, passions would cool and co-operation would develop between Northern Ireland and the new Free State. How anyone thought this possible in the light of the florid language of what was called the Solemn League and Covenant signed by some 250,000 Ulster people in 1912 is a good question. Those folk had pledged themselves to fight, to |use all means which may be found necessary to defeat the ... conspiracy to set up a Home Rule Parliament'.

The mechanisms proposed in 1922 such as the Council of Ireland were never allowed to develop. Partition became a fait accompli set in a mould which has proved unbreakable. The Unionists have seen virtually every move as an attempt by a foreign power to take them over. They look upon the Irish Republic in much the same way as Falkland Islanders see Argentina. Their determination to resist has always been reinforced by terrorists who have tried to force the issue. It is beyond logic to think people can be forced into lasting friendship by being bombed and shot at. The Official IRA and, for the past quarter of a century, the Provisional IRA (PIRA) have, without doubt, worked against the United Ireland they claim to want. If only NORAID and other sympathisers overseas could have understood that!

But is terrorism really going to end? Even if PIRA lays down its arms for a while, is there not then a danger that, just as PIRA succeeded the Officials, there will be another madcap organisation ready to continue or renew the fight? The only sensible hope is that co-operation will develop and the world will see that Ireland will never be united by the bomb. Then support will wither away. The best way to defeat the bomber must be to tell the truth and go on doing so loudly and clearly.

The British Government has always maintained that it will uphold the democratically expressed will of the majority in Northern Ireland. In the light of what has happened, whether one is Unionist or not, this must be recognised as plain commonsense. What is more, the Government of the Republic, in spite of the clauses in the constitution claiming the whole island, offensive to some, has agreed. One would think Unionists would now be reassured enough to be happy to enter into talks with Nationalists and seek some way of living together peacefully. In the end, all Irish men and women have got to live on the same island and must find a way of doing so.

John Major has, however, now gone on to say that his Government is neutral about the Union and will support it only so long as the majority want it. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can We Learn from Irish History?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.