Hostile Takeover: The Corruption of Politics in the United States: An Interview with David Sirota

Multinational Monitor, May-June 2006 | Go to article overview

Hostile Takeover: The Corruption of Politics in the United States: An Interview with David Sirota


David Sirota is a campaign strategist, political operative and writer, and author of Hostile Takeover: How Big Money & Corruption Conquered Our Government-and How We Take It Back. He has worked for Vermont Representative Bernie Sanders and Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, among others. Sirota is senior editor at In These Times, a regular contributor to The Nation and a regular guest on the Al Franken radio show. He is co-chair of the Progressive Legislative Action Network.

Multinational Monitor: What is the significance of Jack Abramoff?

David Sirota: Jack Abramoff raises the issue of corruption from an intangible issue to one that has a face.

I don't think that the importance of Jack Abramoff is that he did something so much worse than what happens in many ways on a daily basis in Congress.

Obviously what he did was illegal and awful, but what he did is replicated in all sorts of different ways oil Capitol Hill, oftentimes in ways that are legal.

The silver lining of Jack Abramoff is that he has enabled the general public to be better educated about how deep the pay-to-play culture goes in Washington.

MM: Do people really care about the corruption issue?

Sirota: When you poll the word "corruption," it does not poll very high. That's because people tend to think that both parties are corrupt; in fact, they tend to think that politics itself is corrupt--and they're not wrong, unfortunately.

But I think that people care, when corruption is connected to the challenges they face on a daily basis. When you connect the fact that the oil industry gave hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions and was allowed to write the energy bill with the fact that people are paying $3 for gasoline, then I think people care about corruption.

Similarly, when you connect the fact that we are paying the highest prices for medicines in the world with the fact that the drug industry is writing our Medicare bills and our prescription drug laws, then I think suddenly people really do care. And they should.

What the Democrats haven't done--what neither party has done--is connect corruption to the issues of the day. When you see stories in the mainstream press that say, "Oh, the public doesn't care about corruption," that's not true. The public doesn't care about corruption in a vacuum. I think the public cares very much about corruption when the case is made--and it is an accurate case--that corruption affects their daily lives in all sorts of ways.

MM: Are all politicians corrupt?

Sirota: No, absolutely not.

Let me step back and say this: I don't think all of the politicians in Washington are corrupt. I think almost all of them are in a corrupt system. And that's not their fault--or at least that's not all of their fault.

To run for federal office, you basically have to be good at shaking down big money interests for cash, because the system requires you to raise your money from private sources. That's essentially pay-to-play built right into the system.

There are Members of Congress that have managed to raise more money from sources that don't expect legislative favors than from those interests that do expect legislative favors. The Internet is largely a fundraising base of people who don't expect specific legislative favors--which would only improve their personal livelihoods--in exchange for their donation. Progressive Internet donors want candidates who will support a progressive agenda, but they are not looking for a federal contract, if you will.

I think that there are good people in Congress who are able to fight against the hostile takeover of our government even though they are in a corrupt system.

But we have to understand that corruption is hard-wired into the system. Any system that forces candidates--at least those who are not multimillionaires willing to invest millions in their own campaigns--to raise most or all of their campaign money from private interests is one that is going to have corruption hard-wired into it. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Hostile Takeover: The Corruption of Politics in the United States: An Interview with David Sirota
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.