Tort Reform

By Walling, Alastair J. | Regulation, Fall 2006 | Go to article overview

Tort Reform


Walling, Alastair J., Regulation


The court system is generally transparent--perhaps a little too transparent for those whose dirty laundry gets aired in public court documents. But the courts are only the very small public tip of the mostly concealed tort iceberg.

While no one is exactly sure about the actual numbers, experts in this area estimate that 90 percent of potential tort cases are never even filed, and perhaps 90 to 95 percent of the filed cases never see the light of court. What happens to all of those cases? Most of them are settled quietly and discretely; we never get to observe the agreements or how they are reached. Thus, as perhaps 99 percent of the human behavior within the tort system occurs out of court and out of sight, it becomes difficult to measure the effects of tort reforms.

The hidden negotiations that dominate the tort system make reform a lot like Forrest Gump's metaphorical box of chocolates: You never know what you're going to get. It might be that years after it is implemented, we would discover that "reform" only adds to the nation's litigation headaches.

Take, for example, the "reform" of prejudgment interest. Common law did not allow injured parties to earn interest that would have accrued between the time of their injury and final award or settlement. Worried that the parties and their lawyers were drawing out trials and settlement negotiations and unnecessarily clogging the courts, early tort reformers hit on the idea of charging defendants for the interest that plaintiffs would have otherwise enjoyed if they had been paid at the time of their injury. According to the American Tort Reform Association, however, contrary to the reformers' expectations, the award of prejudgment interest actually impeded settlement and also led to overcompensation.

In the various states, tort reformers are trying other rule changes in the hope that they will reform perceived problems within existing tort systems. The problem is, like the experience with prejudgment interest, until the rules are in place and affecting real people, it seems we will not know how effective they will be at actually improving the fairness and efficiency of the courts.

Or will we? New experimental research offers a promising alternative to the trial-and-error testing of reforms in the real world. My George Mason University colleague Kevin McCabe has designed tort reform experiments that link parties representing plaintiff and defendant attorneys by computer and have them negotiate settlements. McCabe assigns parties a different mix of variables, including the strength of the case and the settlement's maximum and minimum possible compensation values. If the two parties come to an agreement during the allotted time, then the case is settled and the experiment repeats. However, if the parties fail to agree, the computer charges both parties "court fees" and imposes a settlement. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Tort Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.