Drug Legalization Can't Work and Would Devastate Our Work

By Brown, Lee | Insight on the News, June 27, 1994 | Go to article overview

Drug Legalization Can't Work and Would Devastate Our Work


Brown, Lee, Insight on the News


Justifiably, crime and violence are high on the list of issues that concern Americans. As this concern increases, there is a heightened sense of need for dramatic action. Sometimes, however, such pressure leads to desperately conceived notions that ultimately will be more devastating than the current crisis.

Legalizing drugs is one of those notions. It is not a new idea; debates about legalization have been going on for the past several years. Americans oppose the idea, and no serious-minded policymaker would ever consider it. What is troubling is the emergence of the issue right now.

There can be no rational argument that legalization would be a panacea for our social ills. On the contrary, it will only exacerbate the violence. The Clinton administration is vehemently opposed to drug legalization in any form. In the national drug strategy, the president stated, "This administration will never consider the legalization of illegal drugs."

For the first time in many decades, there is a comprehensive, coordinated strategy to deal with the underlying causes of drugs and crime. The Clinton administration is totally committed to investing in America. Creative initiatives such as community policing, empowerment zones, national service, health care reform, worker retraining for the unemployed and welfare reform offer a powerful combination of hope and opportunity to communities in which drugs and crime normally thrive. How can support be sustained for efforts to revitalize communities hit hardest by drug abuse and violence if we are willing to permit such activities to occur?

Legalization advocates seem adept at raising the issue, but they have a tough time translating their ideas into anything that is practical and workable. They don't tell us what drugs they would legalize or where they would sell them and for how much -- even as they continue to press the same fallacious arguments:

* Drug legalization will reduce the burden on our prison and court systems. Why do we have to legalize drugs to ease prison overcrowding and lighten court dockets? Effective drug control requires bold and effective programs to stop the recidivism overwhelming our criminal justice system.

We need more programs such as the newly created High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area in the Washington-Baltimore region that targets chronic, hard-core drug use. President Clinton's anticrime agenda calls for the development of other innovative concepts such as boot camps to address the nonviolent offender population.

According to the National Center for State Courts, about 20 local jurisdictions -- most of them large urban areas -- are either experimenting with or running full-time programs that provide treatment and rehabilitation for offenders (as opposed to incarceration) or separate courts for drug violators to improve case flow. In Dade County, Fla., for example, prosecutors and defenders in relevant cases are allowed to reach agreements through which defendants are diverted from incarceration into rehabilitation. Some court systems, such as those in St. Paul, Minn., and Washington, D.C., combine these approaches.

* Drug legalization will reduce crime and violence by removing the profit motive. Legalization advocates just don't get it. Many drugs are illegal because they are addictive. They are mind-altering and cause catastrophic outcomes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Drug Legalization Can't Work and Would Devastate Our Work
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.