Toward a Feminist Expansion of Macroeconomics: Money Matters

By Jennings, Ann L. | Journal of Economic Issues, June 1994 | Go to article overview

Toward a Feminist Expansion of Macroeconomics: Money Matters


Jennings, Ann L., Journal of Economic Issues


Orthodox economics has long been confident that money is of minor importance in economic life. From Adam Smith onward, we have heard that it is real goods, not money, that determine economic well-being and that "economic scarcity" refers to scarce goods and scarce real resources. Though economic values are expressed in money terms, and money facilitates the circulation of goods, many economists continue to believe that it is both nominal and neutral in exchange relationships. In standard microeconomics, now dominated by the barter models of Walrasian general equilibrium, money plays no role whatever [Minsky 1990]. It is simply a mathematical convenience for avoiding the price permutations of barter.

In standard macroeconomics, now dominated by monetarism, the situation is largely similar. Monetarists assert either that money does not matter or that it is all that matters. This reflects the Walrasian foundations of current monetarism: under "normal" circumstances, money is irrelevant [Minsky 1990]; but, in the closed and timeless Walrasian hermeneutic, nothing ever happens except when the essentially alien force of money is interjected. Orthodox Keynesianism, now in retreat, does include exogenous money as an economic variable, but it neglects Keynes's [1936] preeminent concern with monetary factors in business cycles. Meanwhile, more recent orthodox variations, such as those of the New Keynesians, further discount money in attempts to render Keynes compatible with microeconomic barter [DeMartino 1993].

Outside orthodoxy, the situation is quite different. For Marxists, Post Keynesians, and institutionalists alike, money is central to macroeconomic arguments; orthodox barter models are replaced with some form of "monetary theory of production." That is, a necessary connection between money and profit-seeking behavior is recognized [Wray 1990], and money is a real determinant of economic well-being.

Minsky's Monetary Theory of Production

For most heterodox economists, capitalist profits must be realizable in money form. Keynes used Marx's M-C-M' formulation in his lectures [Dillard 1987], while Veblen [1919] saw the production of goods as only a necessary inconvenience for those intent on pecuniary aggrandizement. Money is the end-in-view of production, not a "convenience," whereas production appears as a relatively convenient vehicle for acquiring money.

The money profits that capitalists desire require someone else to accept the goods that capitalists call forth to yield profits but do not themselves want. Minsky [1986, 151] presents the situation as one in which

[Pi]* = I + Df - BTDF + c[Pi]* - sW*.

After-tax profits are equal to business investment, plus government deficits, minus trade deficits (plus trade surpluses), plus consumption out of profits, minus savings out of wages (plus consumer borrowing). Minsky's equation, which can also be used to show how prices bear profits, has a mercantilist cast. Capitalists accumulate money profits--or, surplus claims on goods--when other units incur deficits in money claims on goods. If capitalists consume or invest with money profits, money deficits and surpluses are not needed. But if capitalists are wary of goods and insist on money, investment falters; deficits are then required for satisfactory profit and production levels.

Contrary to Smithian accounts, money is the form of wealth that matters in capitalism. The employment of resources and the output of real goods will languish if investment, capitalist consumption, and money deficits do not sum to the necessary level of profit. In capitalism, money wags the tail of goods; capitalism is not a monetized form of barter, nor have economies organized primarily by barter ever existed [Wray 1990].

Some Feminist Issues

Two questions are now posed. First, what legitimates the peculiar prominence of money in capitalism? As bell hooks [1990, 40] asks, quoting Mama from A Raisin in the Sun, "'Since when did money become life? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Toward a Feminist Expansion of Macroeconomics: Money Matters
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.