To Market, to Market, with What? Some Observations on Labor Market Rationales for Industrial Policy

By Thomas, Celia; Friberg, Emil | Journal of Economic Issues, June 1994 | Go to article overview

To Market, to Market, with What? Some Observations on Labor Market Rationales for Industrial Policy


Thomas, Celia, Friberg, Emil, Journal of Economic Issues


With the arrival of the Clinton administration in Washington came an increase in the volume of rhetoric calling for government policies aimed at creating "good" jobs, "high-performance" jobs, and more jobs in "high-value," "high-tech," or high-performance" sectors. In accepting his party's nomination, President Clinton reiterated the platform position that "the most important family policy, urban policy, labor policy, minority policy, and foreign policy America can have is an expanding, entrepreneurial economy of high-wage, high-skill jobs" [Clinton 1992, 2171]. This is an admirable policy goal that resonates well with a public concerned with the place of American labor in the new world economic order.

In keeping with this interest, the Departments of Labor and Commerce have been seeking to define what constitutes a "high-performance" job for purposes of policymaking. How the definition is ultimately determined is important since arguments for high-wage, high-skill jobs often turn into arguments that the government should favor certain industries over others. For example, some have argued that manufacturing industries contribute more to employment and wage income than does the service sector and thus should be supported; others contend that high-value agricultural product exports create more jobs and greater income than do bulk commodity exports and should be encouraged-even subsidized; and that high-technology industries are, from the standpoint of wages paid, better than low-technology ones and thus worthy of activist trade and industrial policies. These comparisons are often the justification for new priorities in government programs and spending.

The question of whether the mix of government policies that favors "good" jobs is the same mix of policies that favors a broader national welfare objective - such as increasing national income over some horizon - is explicitly addressed in some, but by no means all, of this discussion. The question is, in fact, a complicated one, and this paper identifies some of the issues that must be addressed before it can be answered. In the remainder of this paper, we first examine three studies that claim to show that government should favor certain industries or sectors over others. For each of these studies, we point out important and in some cases unrealistic underlying assumptions. Second, we discuss the evidence on wage differentials between industries and how that relates to policy priorities. And third, we ask what the conditions should be for concluding that government support for one industry or set of industries is most likely to increase welfare or to raise living standards through economic growth.

The idea that manufacturing industries contribute more to job and income creation than do the service and retail-trade sectors has been advanced by the Economic Policy Institute. In one study, EPI analysts use a labor requirements table derived from input-output statistics for the U.S. economy to estimate the secondary employment associated with each job in different sectors [Baker 1993!. These secondary jobs are in supplier industries and in those sectors where workers spend their income. The study finds that a manufacturing job results in 4.2 indirect jobs, which is more than four times the number of secondary jobs created by a job in retail trade (.94 indirect jobs per retail trade job) and almost three times the secondary job creation of a job in personal and business services (1.5 indirect jobs per service job). The study concludes that a significantly larger increase in service employment is required to offset the total employment effect of a lost manufacturing job. The authors suggest that the secondary employment effect shows that government policies to support a specific industry may be desirable.

However, the data used in this study also reveal that the number of jobs (direct and indirect) created by a fixed dollar amount of fiscal spending vary so as to favor job creation in the service and retail sectors. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

To Market, to Market, with What? Some Observations on Labor Market Rationales for Industrial Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.