It's a Mad Mad World: Iran and Israel Are Not the Only Middle East Countries Chasing a Nuclear Capability. Thomas Land Analyses the Atomic Race Taking Place throughout the Region

By Land, Thomas | The Middle East, December 2006 | Go to article overview

It's a Mad Mad World: Iran and Israel Are Not the Only Middle East Countries Chasing a Nuclear Capability. Thomas Land Analyses the Atomic Race Taking Place throughout the Region


Land, Thomas, The Middle East


IRAN HAS JUST inaugurated facilities for the production of plutonium. Israel has announced the purchase of nuclear-capable submarines from Germany dedicated to a 'second strike' role hitherto untried in the Middle East. Egypt and Turkey have announced enormous new national atomic power development plans essential for joining a nuclear arms race with Iran in order to maintain regional stability. All this could push Saudi Arabia into taking the decision to build or purchase the bomb.

The Middle East has woken up to the nightmare principle of mutual assured destruction (MAD), invented during the bleakest days of the Cold War, which ended with the demise of the Soviet Union less than two decades ago. The idea was that the chief antagonists and their allies invest enormous and escalating resources in the arms race to ensure their adversaries dare not attack them for fear of precipitating their own certain peril.

This fattened the armaments manufacturers and brought humanity closer to destruction during the 20th century than at any other time since the Ice Age. There were hopes after the Cold War that the squandered resources could now be invested for the good of humanity in a form of 'peace dividend'. Instead, the world economy, which had been dominated by a voracious military-industrial complex present in all countries, plunged into recession because it could not cope with a prolonged absence of huge renewed armament orders.

Three bloody, lucrative, American-led wars in the Middle East--two in Iraq and one in Afghanistan--have changed that. US defence spending this year is $550bn, 50% more than the budget inherited from the Clinton administration in 2001 and almost as large as the combined military expenditure of all the other countries of the world.

These Middle East wars and the ill-defined, burgeoning 'war on terror' which feeds from them, have also upset the delicate Shi'a/ Sunni divide of the region. They destroyed the Sunni powers of the Taliban in Afghanistan in November 2001 and Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq in April 2003--hitherto the greatest regional rivals of Shi'a Iran.

Israel's conflict on two fronts in June-July 2006, against the Palestinians in Gaza and Hizbullah in Lebanon, has added to the re gional dimensions of this instability. As a consequence, Iran's influence has increased hugely. It now rivals that of the United States as the main gatekeeper at the crossroads between the Middle East and Asia.

This is explored in a landmark analysis just published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs at Chatham House in London. The study--Iran, its Neighbours the Regional Crisis--has been compiled by an outstanding team of specialists. Some aspects of the work are already overtaken by events because of the quick pace of development of the drama. But it may well remain for some time a trusted source of advice and basic reference to politicians, investors and students of the troubled region.

The study concludes that a prospective American-sponsored military strike to prevent Iran from building the bomb would be devastating for that country, the Gulf and areas beyond. Iran warns that any such attack would provoke a terrible retribution meted out on Israel. The Chatham House analysis observes that a military conflict involving Iran must be global in scale because of the economic interdependence binding that country with the world's principal hydrocarbon importers.

Iran's nuclear ambitions date back to the pre-revolutionary era of the Shah in the 1960s. The county's present rulers insist that their programme is entirely legal and peaceful. But they have built two long-range missiles with a reach of up to 2,000km capable of hitting much of the Middle East, including Israel, and some of Europe. They have also purchased a set of MB-25s from North Korea with a reach of 2,500km. And they are developing a missile designed specifically for delivering a nuclear payload. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

It's a Mad Mad World: Iran and Israel Are Not the Only Middle East Countries Chasing a Nuclear Capability. Thomas Land Analyses the Atomic Race Taking Place throughout the Region
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.