On the Spot: A Functional Analysis of Congressional Television Spots, 1980-2004

By Brazeal, LeAnn M.; Benoit, William L. | Communication Studies, December 2006 | Go to article overview

On the Spot: A Functional Analysis of Congressional Television Spots, 1980-2004


Brazeal, LeAnn M., Benoit, William L., Communication Studies


Introduction

Congressional elections are crucial to the American political system. They offer citizens an opportunity to influence the direction of government, hold their representatives accountable (Maisel, 1999) and reinforce the legitimacy of the American political system (Jacobson, 2001). Although congressional elections occur twice as often as--and include far more players than--presidential races, they receive substantially less public and scholarly attention. This is unfortunate, because the unique nature of House and Senate constituencies requires congressional campaigns to pay special attention to the specific needs of voters in a particular state or district. Furthermore, Graber (1989) noted that "television commercials often provide the only chance to gain information about the many candidates who are ignored by the media" in primary or nonpresidential campaigns (p. 196). In addition, smaller constituencies and lower voter turnout make each vote cast in a race for House or Senate count more than votes cast in presidential elections. Abramowitz and Segal (1992) observed that "television advertising has become the primary method by which Senate candidates communicate with the voters" (p. 230). Similarly, Goldstein, Krasno, Bradford, and Seltz (2001) argued that "In many House races ..., television advertising ... is the chief way that candidates for Congress communicate their messages to voters" (p. 92). So, it is imperative for congressional candidates to spend millions of dollars on advertising (Gordon, 2000; Jenkins, 1997; Miller & Miller, 2000). Congressional campaign spots elections clearly merit scholarly attention.

Past research has not employed a longitudinal approach to studying TV spots in congressional campaigns. This study will fill this void in the literature. The next section reviews the literature of congressional campaign television spots. After that, we articulate this study's purpose, research questions, and method. Finally, findings are presented and discussed.

Literature Review

In this section, we review the literature on television advertising in congressional campaigns. First, we discuss previous content analyses that have explored the functions (or tone of television spots. Then we discuss the topics of congressional television spots (i.e., issues or policy, candidate image or character).

Functions of Congressional Television Spots

Several studies investigate the function or tone of congressional campaign ads. For example, Kern's (1989) study of spots from the 1984 North Carolina campaigns found that about half of the U.S. House spots, and 60% of U.S. Senate ads, were negative (see also studies by Abbe, Herrnson, Magleby, & Patterson, 2001; Airne & Benoit, 2005; Benze & Declercq, 1985; Brazeal & Benoit, 2001; Bystrom & Miller, 1999; Goldstein, Krasno, Bradford, & Seltz, 2001; Hale, Fox, & Farmer, 1996; Johnston, 1999; Johnston & White, 1994; Kahn & Kenney, 1999; Lau & Pomper, 2004; Payne & Baukus, 1988; and Pfau, Parrott, & Lindquist, 1992). Research has also established that incumbency status is related to the tone of ads. Goldstein, Krasno, Bradford, and Seitz (2001) found that 65% of incumbent ads in 1998 were positive and 17% were negative, whereas 36% of challenger spots were positive and 42% were negative (see also Abbe et al., 2001; Airne & Benoit, 2005; Brazeal & Benoit, 2001; Hale, Fox, & Farmer, 1996; Kahn & Kenney, 2000; Lau & Pomper 2004; Payne & Baukus, 1988). Airne and Benoit (2005) reported the tone for Democratic and Republican spots from the House and Senate in 2000. Calculation of [chi square] S on their data reveals no significant difference in acclaims or attacks by political party in either sample of ads. Lau and Pomper (2004), on the other hand (relying on newspaper reports rather than content analysis of ads), found that Senate Republicans were more likely to attack than Democrats from 1990-2002. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

On the Spot: A Functional Analysis of Congressional Television Spots, 1980-2004
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.