Comparative Development - South Asia, East and South East Asia

By Huda, S. M. | Economic Review, June 1994 | Go to article overview

Comparative Development - South Asia, East and South East Asia


Huda, S. M., Economic Review


Before any analysis is attempted in regard to development in East Asia, South East Asia and South Asia, it would be appropriate to mention some of the special features of the countries in the region. The countries in East Asia are small in size and have a total population of 91 million, the largest being South Korea with a population of 42.79 million. All of them had a high rate of education and an industrial structure inherited from the past because of policies of the former colonial power. In addition, they have the Chinese culture of hard work and labour discipline.

South East Asia has a total population of 387.79 million with the largest concentration of population in Indonesia. Historically, the countries in the region have been governed by different colonial powers in the past inheriting their economic system as suppliers of raw materials to the metropolitan power with less attention paid to social and industrial sector. The only exception is Thailand which has not been under any colonial power. Further these countries differ in culture and religion among themselves. Another feature of these countries is the existence of a strong minority of Chinese with their culture of hard work and labour discipline.

South Asia is different to East Asia and South East Asia. It has a population of more than 1 billion except for Nepal and Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan and India are far bigger in size and population than the countries of East Asia. The same situation holds in comparison to countries of South East Asia except Indonesia. India alone has a population of 828 million followed by Pakistan 112 million and Bangladesh 111 million. They have a population with varied religion and culture. The large size in area and population has demanded greater development of resources to meet the domestic as well as external requirements. However, there is one common element in all these countries except Nepal that it has been under the British rule. While they inherited the British colonial system of administration, social and economic sectors were neglected resulting in low percentage of literacy and other social indicators. Even the industrial structure was far incommensurate with the size and population of those countries. They mainly served as suppliers of raw materials and consumers of manufactured products from the metropolitan power.

East Asia

The remarkable success of the East Asian countries is attributed to a number of factors like political stability, high literacy rate and the adoption of an outward looking development strategy along with flexibility in adopting to external and internal change.

The political stability in these countries was achieved during the long period of authoritarian regimes. It ensured economic policies with objectives of long term growth. Further by not allowing trade union activities production was not disturbed in the initial stages of development. It had a salutary effect on investment as it encouraged high level of foreign investment in those countries. They had of course, the support of the western powers particularly of USA.

Besides political stability, these countries had extensive primary and vocational education during the pre war period. By 1940s attendance was more than half of primary school age children in public schools. In fact, these countries had, in the post war era higher literacy levels than any other developing countries in Asia with the exception of Philippines.

As mentioned earlier flexible economic policies have helped in their economic development. These policies included high rate of savings, stable exchange rate, reduced deficit on revenue account and controlled income policies. It is important to point out that in the miraculous success of the economy of South Korea conglomerates have played a very vital part in contributing towards the economic growth of various sectors of the Korean economy. No doubt, five year plans were drawn up by the government but big corporations took the challenge and far exceeded the targets laid down under the various plans. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Comparative Development - South Asia, East and South East Asia
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.