Patent Policies of 65 Educational Institutions: A Comparison

By Bowers, Lynne Jordan; Leon, Vickie | SRA Journal, Spring 1994 | Go to article overview

Patent Policies of 65 Educational Institutions: A Comparison


Bowers, Lynne Jordan, Leon, Vickie, SRA Journal


Introduction

In the 1970s, U.S. research universities began a heavy commitment to the transfer of technology to industry. Events of the 1980s, from the "promise of biotechnology" to the promulgation of new patent law and increased federal involvement, further influenced university policies. The distinction between knowledge transfer and technology transfer, as well as increasing interest in commercializing research, is chronicled by Gary W. Matkin in Technology Transfer and the University (1990). Matkin's highly readable study is commended to the reader who seeks a broader understanding of this controversial and timely issue. For evidence of controversy, one need only look at the August 4, 1993, issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education, which includes an article entitled "Struggle over a patent brings prison term for former U. of South Florida student." The timeliness of this issue is supported by the fact that 75% of the 65 patent policies reviewed here were revised since 1980, 20% in 1990-93 alone. Columbia University's patent policy directs that the policy is to be "reexamined at least once every five years."

A comparative review of 65 current patent policies was undertaken in the summer of 1993. The differences and similarities of the key features of the policies are discussed below. These key features can serve as a primer for those who need only a cursory understanding of the issues related to patent policies. Consideration of the observed differences among the policies should be of interest to those who require a greater understanding of patent policies.

Copies of the policies reviewed here were available in the authors' files in 1993, when this article was written. The authors managed a competitive grants program that supported research for the Superconducting Super Collider. The grant conditions for that program required that funded institutions submit a copy of their patent policy. The institutions described herein represent all of the institutions with faculty who were funded by the state of Texas for SSC-related research and educational programs in the summer of 1993. These institutions can be assumed to be representative of institutions with programs in high-energy physics.

Why Have a Patent Policy?

The debate over the appropriateness of the mercialization of research versus creation of knowledge for its own sake began before 1924, when the first university patent policies were adopted by Lehigh University and Columbia University, in that order. There are those who contend that scientists should publish and dedicate their discoveries to the public and that the prospect of patents and commercialization corrupts the purposes of the university. In 1948, the patent policies of the University of Chicago and Yale University did not allow the staff of the university to profit monetarily from research by means of patents, royalties, or licensing agreements. By contrast, a survey of university patent policies published in 1948 by Archie Palmer included this quote by Elihu Thomson in his address to the 1920 graduating class of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology:

Publish an invention freely, and it will almost surely die from lack of interest in its development. It will not be developed and the world will not be benefitted. Patent it, and if valuable, it will be taken up and developed into a business.

How many of the patent policies reviewed here acknowledge the existence of this historical debate about the university's role? Eighteen percent include a preamble or rationale that recognizes this issue. Sixty-six percent of the policies reviewed cite maximizing the benefits to the public as the rationale for instituting the policy. After public good, the most frequently cited reasons are to protect the interests of the inventor, the university, and external sponsors, in that order. All of the reasons cited in the patent policies are listed in Table 2. Eighteen percent of the policies include neither introductory statements nor any objectives for the policy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Patent Policies of 65 Educational Institutions: A Comparison
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.