Recovery: The Bridge to Integration? Part Two; Structural Differences Pose the Main Challenge to Integrating the Mental Health and Addiction Fields

By White, William L.; Davidson, Larry | Behavioral Healthcare, December 2006 | Go to article overview

Recovery: The Bridge to Integration? Part Two; Structural Differences Pose the Main Challenge to Integrating the Mental Health and Addiction Fields


White, William L., Davidson, Larry, Behavioral Healthcare


Editor's note: In our November issue, the authors described some of the reasons the mental health and addictions fields have had trouble integrating in the past. They also discussed how recovery could be a conceptual bridge to the integration of the fields. Here they conclude their discussion by examining how emerging recovery systems are different from traditional models of care.

Understanding that system change, like recovery, must be led by people with lived experiences of recovery, the Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services consulted with statewide recovery advocacy organizations to develop a set of core recovery values (e.g., self-sufficiency, dignity, and respect) and principles to drive their system transformation process. These principles included the following admonitions:

* Focus on people rather than services

* Monitor outcomes rather than procedural performance

* Emphasize strengths rather than deficits or dysfunction

* Educate the public to combat stigma

* Foster collaboration as an alternative to coercion

* Promote autonomy and decrease reliance on professionals (1)

Transforming Practices

As we have watched and helped facilitate these experiments in system transformation in states such as Connecticut and cities such as Philadelphia, we have been struck by the broad changes in practices in both mental health and addiction agencies that unfold as an outcome of recovery-focused system change. Some of the most profound of these changes have occurred in the following areas (2):

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Roles of clients, families, and recovery advocates. People with mental illnesses or addictions are no longer viewed as problems a system has to deal with. People in recovery are considered valuable assets and partners, with involvement at all organizational levels and across major functions (e.g., policy development, planning, service delivery, and service evaluation). They are in advisory, volunteer, and paid roles. Their decisions are crucial to long-term recovery, and a philosophy of choice guides all levels of care.

Identification, engagement, and retention. Assertive outreach programs shift from pain-based to hope-based intervention strategies and have lowered thresholds of admission, increased use of case management to resolve obstacles to participation, and used motivational enhancement and contingency management to lower the number of clients disengaging from services against medical advice or being administratively discharged.

Assessment. Assessment protocols shift from being categorical (specialized), pathology-based, and individual-focused to being global, strengths-based, family-centered, and continual.

Service goals. Symptom reduction/remission shifts from a goal to a strategy, focusing on quality of life, achievement of personal aspirations, and meaningful participation in and service to the community.

Service planning and service team. There has been a rapid transition from professionally directed treatment plans to client-driven recovery plans, along with a move to multiagency, interdisciplinary service models and an inclusion of family and indigenous healers (clergy, folk healers, recovery peers, etc.) in treatment and recovery planning processes.

Role of the community. There is an emphasis on local recovery education and policy advocacy. The community is no longer viewed as a context for or precipitant of relapse, but rather as a reservoir of resources, hospitality, and support. The focus is on collaboration with existing recovery support resources and community development strategies to expand the scope and quality of such resources.

Service timing. The system shifts from crisis-based contact to long-term support focused on critical windows of peak functioning (to acknowledge and celebrate recovery) and critical windows of vulnerability (to provide support through situations that pose a risk for relapse). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Recovery: The Bridge to Integration? Part Two; Structural Differences Pose the Main Challenge to Integrating the Mental Health and Addiction Fields
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.