Undue Process

By Samaha, Adam M. | Stanford Law Review, December 2006 | Go to article overview

Undue Process


Samaha, Adam M., Stanford Law Review


INTRODUCTION
I. DECISION AND COST
     A. Nightmares
         1. Stroud Township
         2. Katrina and FEMA
         3. Death row.
         4. Filibusters
         5. "Peanut butter"
         6. Yucca Mountain
     B. Conceptual Introduction
     C. Working Definitions
         1. Decision
         2. Decision costs
 II. CONSTITUTIONAL READINGS
     A. The Whole Text
         1. Focal points
         2. Empirical inquiries
     B. The Parts Elaborated
         1. Cross-cutting norms
         2. Localized norms
             a. Positive lawmaking
             b. Criminal procedure and rights parasites
             c. Final judgments and litigation burdens
             d. Quasi-Mathews and substantive due process
III. UNDUE PROCESS IN THEORY
     A. Constitutional Options
     B. Process Theories and Undue Process Policy
         1. Rights retrofitted
         2. Utilitarianism and rule of law
     C. Undue Process as Constitutional Law
         1. Stories of systematic failure
         2. Institutional choice and design
     D. Nightmares Relived
         1. Plausible objections
         2. Implausible objections
CONCLUSION

He has no equal on earth, being created without fear.... [O]f all the sons of pride he is the king. ([dagger])

But because he is mortal and subject to decay, as all other earthly creatures are.... I shall in the next following chapters speak of his diseases, and the causes of his mortality.... ([dagger])([dagger])

INTRODUCTION

Locating the law of due process is too easy. Our statutes, regulations, case reporters, and academic journals are packed with ideas about when government makes decisions too precipitously, or without adequate participation, or with insufficient assurance of accuracy. For example, the minimum process necessary for a lawful government decision under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments is a renowned feature of the U.S. Constitution. And its associated scholarship has an almost immeasurable scope. (1) Such inquiries are often connected to an attitude about government. They treat the state as a force to be feared and constrained, by process if nothing else. (2) On this view, the most valuable parts of the Constitution include its Due Process Clauses, preservation of habeas corpus, overlapping authority on matters of war and peace, and elaborate requirements for statute making and constitutional amendment. Among the heroic instances of judicial intervention are marquee cases like Gideon v. Wainwright, (3) Goldberg v. Kelly, (4) Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (Steel Seizure), (5) and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. (6)

If you want to understand "undue process"--the point at which government decision making becomes too tardy, or too inclusive, or too careful as a matter of law--there is far less material competing for your attention. This is certainly true for constitutional law and theory. We do not have an integrated examination of the Constitution for the caps it places, and should place, on decision costs. Although the text seems to lack a crosscutting guarantee against undue process, certain lines of constitutional law do cabin government procedure. Animating their drive for recognition is a conviction that an efficacious and efficient state is necessary to successful social life: that "the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty," not to mention other demands for social justice. (7) A vigorous state and sensible resource allocation are jeopardized by excessive hand-wringing, all-inclusive roundtable deliberation, and unrealistic hopes for perfection. On this view, we ought to cheer for arcane provisions like the default date for congressional assembly and the rules of presidential succession, (8) along with the Double Jeopardy, Speedy Trial, and Full Faith and Credit Clauses. (9) We should celebrate pitifully obscure decisions such as Hollingsworth v. Virginia, (10) Klopfer v. North Carolina, (11) and Plaut v. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Undue Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.