Legal Eagles Prey on Malpractice Suits

By Joyce, Sherman | Insight on the News, November 7, 1994 | Go to article overview

Legal Eagles Prey on Malpractice Suits


Joyce, Sherman, Insight on the News


The debate about reforming our system of damage awards in civil lawsuits is understandably passionate.

Critics of the system argue that sympathetic claimants are the beneficiaries of excessive awards because jurors, who always hail from the same community as the claimant, believe that justice will be served if the "deep-pocket" defendant is made to dig deep into that pocket. Defenders of the current system of torts (damages suffered by someone for which another person is legally liable) usually are lawyers who represent injured persons on a contingency-fee basis; this arrangement entitles them to receive a percentage of the jury award or settlement (usually one-third). They believe that any limitation on awards is inappropriate.

The real issue, however, is whether the current system deters misconduct while enhancing safety and providing fair compensation to injured persons in a timely fashion. Regrettably, the system fails badly in meeting these objectives.

It is beyond dispute that litigation in our society costs far too much and takes too long to conclude. According to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, which for more than a decade has considered legislation to establish uniform national rules for product-liability law, cases take nearly three years to conclude once a suit is filed.

Opponents of tort reform argue that there is no "litigation explosion," but the facts speak otherwise. Plaintiffs with legitimate claims often settle for inadequate amounts because they cannot afford to wait years for compensation. Similarly, defendants who genuinely believe they would prevail on merits at trial often decide to settle a case because the costs of litigating would lead to Pyrrhic victory at best.

Who can blame them? Stella Liebeck, an 81-year-old New Mexico woman, was awarded nearly $2.9 million in punitive damages because she spilled hot coffee she had purchased at the drive-up window of a McDonalds restaurant. The jury awarded her a sum equal to two days' coffee revenue for the parent company. Little wonder that attorneys frequently advise their clients to settle for an amount commonly referred to as "nuisance value."

Lest anyone think that the problems described above affect only lawyers, judges and litigants, witness the testimony presented at the May 20, 1994, hearing of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs on the liability of raw-material suppliers for medical-device manufacturers. The hearing, led by Connecticut Democrat Joseph Lieberman, provides a frightening assessment of the future of the implantable medical-device industry because of product-liability litigation.

Medical-device manufacturers face a critical shortage in the raw materials needed to make their products. The reason: Raw material suppliers have severely cut back production because their inclusion in product-liability lawsuits makes it a totally unacceptable risk. Du Pont has stopped marketing and distributing a type of polyester yarn used in artificial-heart valves even though its use as a component of medical devices represents a mere .002 percent of the overall market for the fiber. In the case of a defective jaw implant for which the company sold 5 cents worth of teflon for each unit, Du Pont spent $8 million defending itself under the doctrine of joint liability. The company since has reached the rational conclusion that supplying device manufacturers is not worth the risk.

But these decisions, no matter how sensible, have chilling implications for our society. Lifesaving medical devices will, as a result of product liability litigation, either be unavailable or in critically short supply.

One of the witnesses who appeared before the committee was Mark Reily of Houston. Reily was joined by his 9-year-old son, Thomas, who was diagnosed in infancy as suffering from hydrocephalus -- water on the brain. Mark Reily recounted how the fluid buildup led Thomas to experience excruciating headaches as an infant. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Legal Eagles Prey on Malpractice Suits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.