The Fate of New York Public Education Is a Matter of Interpretation: A Story of Competing Methods of Constitutional Interpretation, the Nature of Law, and a Functional Approach to the New York Education Article

By Noonan, Bran C. | Albany Law Review, Spring 2007 | Go to article overview

The Fate of New York Public Education Is a Matter of Interpretation: A Story of Competing Methods of Constitutional Interpretation, the Nature of Law, and a Functional Approach to the New York Education Article


Noonan, Bran C., Albany Law Review


The virtues of one generation are not sufficient for the next, any more than the accumulations of knowledge possessed by one age are adequate to the needs of another. (1)

I believe that education is the fundamental method of social progress and reform. I believe that all reforms which rest simply upon the enactment of law, or the threatening of certain penalties, or upon changes in mechanical or outward arrangements, are transitory and futile. (2)

**********

The importance of education in American society and the government's responsibility to provide every child with the opportunity to receive an education is one of the centerpieces of the Brown v. Board of Education legacy. (3) Three generations after Brown, communities no longer struggle over the specific issue of busing, (4) but rather on deficient resources and ineffective educational systems that perpetuate racial and socioeconomic isolation and a substandard quality of education. (5) The underlying social and political promises of Brown raise the question as to what extent government must act to guarantee children a quality education. Without an explicit mandate in the Federal Constitution, the majority of educational responsibility falls to the states. (6)

In 1894, New York State constitutionalized education under Article XI of the New York State Constitution, known as the Education Article, which states: "The legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated." (7) Due to the Education Article's imprecise and general language, the New York State judiciary has struggled to interpret the Article and identify the extent of the state's role in public education under the constitutional mandate. (8) The New York Court of Appeals has employed an originalist method of interpretation in Education Article disputes, (9) finding that plaintiffs maintain a cause of action only in certain extreme circumstances. (10)

Beginning in the 1970s, attempts by educational advocates to bring suits under the Education Article continually failed. (11) Finally, in 2003, advocates achieved a monumental victory in Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State (CFE II), ending a thirty year journey to uncover the substantive rights embedded in the Article. (12) In CFE II, the New York Court of Appeals held that the state finance system failed to provide New York City public schools with the necessary resources to obtain a sound basic education in violation of the Education Article. (13) While the New York State legislature and governor failed to meet the court's deadline to implement the necessary measures to cure the system's infirmities, and appealed many recommended reforms, on November 20, 2006, the Court of Appeals uttered its final word in the CFE case and held that the State must increase funding of New York City public schools, setting the floor at a minimum of $1.93 billion, despite education advocates' request for an increase of at least $4.7 billion. (14) This lengthy litigation took the New York courts to the brink of a constitutional crisis, confronting the very spirit of separation of power principles. (15)

However, despite the legal victory in the CFE case, the Court of Appeals' narrow interpretation of the Article has left it without a framework to adapt to the rising standard of education and the changing social milieu, and, thus, to meet the needs of poorly performing students in the state. (16) The court is unwilling to expand the parameters of the article's reach. The recent cases, Paynter ex rel. Stone v. State and New York Civil Liberties Union v. State (NYCLU), which this Article considers, presented unique claims questioning whether state policies that potentially promote socioeconomic isolation and state nonfeasance are actionable under the Education Article. The Court of Appeals decidedly dismissed both cases for failure to state a claim, leaving a portion of the state student population with minimal recourse. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Fate of New York Public Education Is a Matter of Interpretation: A Story of Competing Methods of Constitutional Interpretation, the Nature of Law, and a Functional Approach to the New York Education Article
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.